La mayor onerosidad fortuita en el contrato de obra pública

dialnet-ar-18-ART0001606417

dialnet

dialnet-ar-18-ART00016064172023-06-24La mayor onerosidad fortuita en el contrato de obra públicaArancibia Mattar, Jaimedesequilibrio financieroOnerousness fortuitouscontractpublic worksfinancial imbalanceOnerosidad fortuitacontratoobra públicaThis paper seeks to answer the question as to which party must assume the hardship caused by fortuitous events in public construction contracts. For this purpose, it is necessary to determine the mechanism for the restoration of the equilibrium lost due to this event, which makes it necessary to distinguish whether the specific regulations or the contract have regulated a compensation regime for such cost overruns. In such a case, as it is obvious, the contract must be followed. However, in the event of a normative or consensual omission on the matter, the doctrine of unforeseeability must be considered. In regard to this, Chilean administrative case law has rejected the application of that theory on the ground that it lacks statutory laws that provide for it. This paper is critical of that doctrine because such silence should be directly filled by the constitutional rule on distributive equality and, therefore, by the social duty to compensate any economic imbalance that cannot be imputed to the builder.Este trabajo procura responder la pregunta acerca de qué parte del contrato de obra pública debe asumir la mayor onerosidad sobreviniente causada por un hecho fortuito. Para ese efecto es preciso determinar la modalidad específica de restauración del equilibrio perdido por ese evento, lo que obliga a distinguir si la normativa específica o el contrato han regulado un régimen de compensación de tales sobrecostos. En tal caso, como es obvio, deberá estarse a lo suscrito. Sin embargo, ante la omisión normativa o consensual sobre el particular, corresponde analizar la aplicación de la doctrina de la imprevisión. Al respecto, la jurisprudencia administrativa chilena ha rechazado la aplicación de la teoría de la imprevisión por falta de normas legales y reglamentarias que la prevean. Este trabajo es crítico de esa doctrina porque el silencio legal determina la vigencia directa de la norma constitucional sobre igualdad distributiva y, por tanto, del deber social de compensar cualquier desequilibrio económico inimputable al constructor.2023text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8990641(Revista) ISSN 0122-9893Revista Derecho del Estado, ISSN 0122-9893, Nº. 56, 2023 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Mayo - Agosto), pags. 335-362spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI

Dialnet

Dialnet AR

Revista Derecho del Estado, ISSN 0122-9893, Nº. 56, 2023 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Mayo - Agosto), pags. 335-362

Spanish

desequilibrio financiero
Onerousness fortuitous
contract
public works
financial imbalance
Onerosidad fortuita
contrato
obra pública

desequilibrio financiero
Onerousness fortuitous
contract
public works
financial imbalance
Onerosidad fortuita
contrato
obra pública
Arancibia Mattar, Jaime
La mayor onerosidad fortuita en el contrato de obra pública

This paper seeks to answer the question as to which party must assume the hardship caused by fortuitous events in public construction contracts. For this purpose, it is necessary to determine the mechanism for the restoration of the equilibrium lost due to this event, which makes it necessary to distinguish whether the specific regulations or the contract have regulated a compensation regime for such cost overruns. In such a case, as it is obvious, the contract must be followed. However, in the event of a normative or consensual omission on the matter, the doctrine of unforeseeability must be considered. In regard to this, Chilean administrative case law has rejected the application of that theory on the ground that it lacks statutory laws that provide for it. This paper is critical of that doctrine because such silence should be directly filled by the constitutional rule on distributive equality and, therefore, by the social duty to compensate any economic imbalance that cannot be imputed to the builder.

Article

Arancibia Mattar, Jaime

Arancibia Mattar, Jaime

Arancibia Mattar, Jaime

La mayor onerosidad fortuita en el contrato de obra pública

La mayor onerosidad fortuita en el contrato de obra pública

La mayor onerosidad fortuita en el contrato de obra pública

La mayor onerosidad fortuita en el contrato de obra pública

La mayor onerosidad fortuita en el contrato de obra pública

la mayor onerosidad fortuita en el contrato de obra pública

2023

https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8990641

1770000644622516224