Razones epistémicas y no epistémicas en la admisión de la prueba testifical en el proceso Penal Peruano
This paper focuses on the analysis of the epistemic and non-epistemic reasons of the admission rules for testimonial proof in the 2004 Criminal Procedure Code. The first reasons address the recognition of the principle of relevance as the guiding criterion for admission of proof, which implies that...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Limay Chavez, Raquel |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8254969 |
Source: | Derecho & Sociedad, ISSN 2079-3634, Nº. 57, 2021, pags. 1-27 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
Similar Items
-
Engenharia epistêmica: entrevista com Murilo Seabra, parte 1
by: Seabra, Murilo, et al.
Published: (2019) -
¿Es útil el concepto de injusticia epistémica para los procedimientos penales?
by: Coloma Correa, Rodrigo, et al.
Published: (2023) -
Engenharia epistêmica: Entrevista com Murilo Seabra, parte 2
by: Seabra, Murilo, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Injustiça epistêmica agencial no processo penal e o problema das confissões extrajudiciais retratadas
by: Navarro Ribeiro Dantas, Marcelo, et al.
Published: (2023) -
A prática de injustiça epistêmica por atribuição de excesso de credibilidade a colaboradores premiados
by: Rodas, Sergio
Published: (2023)