Por que não ponderar ou subsumir?
The aim of this article is to analyze the compatibility of the subsumption and the weighting, used to apply the rules and principles, with the needs of Contemporary Constitutionalism. It will be investigated whether proposals for decision-making techniques, widely adopted in the country's legal...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| Published: |
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8084942 |
| Source: | Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi, ISSN 2447-6536, Vol. 7, Nº. 1, 2020 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001481198
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00014811982021-10-12Por que não ponderar ou subsumir?Dytz Marin, JefersonRamos Neto, Nelson GularteDecisão JudicialPonderaçãoSubsunçãoDecisionPonderPrinciplesRulesSubsumeThe aim of this article is to analyze the compatibility of the subsumption and the weighting, used to apply the rules and principles, with the needs of Contemporary Constitutionalism. It will be investigated whether proposals for decision-making techniques, widely adopted in the country's legal literature, are adequate to what is expected of a new legal paradigm called post-positivism (re-thought from the Democratic State of Law), anticipating that the hypothesis points in the direction of a negative answer, in view of the identity that is established between the above mentioned techniques and the positivist paradigm.O objetivo do presente artigo é analisar a compatibilidade da subsunção e da ponderação, utilizadas para aplicação das regras e princípios, com as necessidades do Constitucionalismo Contemporâneo. Investigar-se-á se propostas de técnicas decisórias, amplamente adotadas pela literatura jurídica pátria, são adequadas ao que se espera de um novo paradigma jurídico denominado pós-positivismo, (re)pensado a partir do Estado Democrático de Direito, antecipando-se que a hipótese aponta no sentido de uma resposta negativa, tendo em vista a identidade que se estabelece entre as técnicas supracitadas e o paradigma positivista.2020text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8084942(Revista) ISSN 2447-6536Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi, ISSN 2447-6536, Vol. 7, Nº. 1, 2020porLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi, ISSN 2447-6536, Vol. 7, Nº. 1, 2020
|
| language |
Portuguese
|
| topic |
Decisão Judicial
Ponderação Subsunção Decision Ponder Principles Rules Subsume |
| spellingShingle |
Decisão Judicial
Ponderação Subsunção Decision Ponder Principles Rules Subsume Dytz Marin, Jeferson Ramos Neto, Nelson Gularte Por que não ponderar ou subsumir? |
| description |
The aim of this article is to analyze the compatibility of the subsumption and the weighting, used to apply the rules and principles, with the needs of Contemporary Constitutionalism. It will be investigated whether proposals for decision-making techniques, widely adopted in the country's legal literature, are adequate to what is expected of a new legal paradigm called post-positivism (re-thought from the Democratic State of Law), anticipating that the hypothesis points in the direction of a negative answer, in view of the identity that is established between the above mentioned techniques and the positivist paradigm.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Dytz Marin, Jeferson
Ramos Neto, Nelson Gularte |
| author_facet |
Dytz Marin, Jeferson
Ramos Neto, Nelson Gularte |
| author_sort |
Dytz Marin, Jeferson
|
| title |
Por que não ponderar ou subsumir?
|
| title_short |
Por que não ponderar ou subsumir?
|
| title_full |
Por que não ponderar ou subsumir?
|
| title_fullStr |
Por que não ponderar ou subsumir?
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Por que não ponderar ou subsumir?
|
| title_sort |
por que não ponderar ou subsumir?
|
| publishDate |
2020
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8084942
|
| _version_ |
1713634228116127744
|