O Judicial Review e o ativismo judicial da Suprema Corte americana na proteção de direitos fundamentais
This article analyses the historical origins of judicial review in the United States since the Marbury v. Madison to Burger Court, as well as the reflections of its conception in the socalled American “judicial activism”, which ended up prioritizing the role of the constitutional jurisdiction in the...
Gorde:
| Egile Nagusiak: | , |
|---|---|
| Formatua: | Artikulua |
| Hizkuntza: | Portugalera |
| Argitaratua: |
2016
|
| Gaiak: | |
| Sarrera elektronikoa: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7277454 |
| Baliabidea: | Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law, ISSN 2179-7943, Vol. 17, Nº. 3, 2016 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law [EJJL] | Quadrimestral), pags. 733-752 |
| Etiketak: |
Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe: Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen
|
| Laburpena: |
This article analyses the historical origins of judicial review in the United States since the Marbury v. Madison to Burger Court, as well as the reflections of its conception in the socalled American “judicial activism”, which ended up prioritizing the role of the constitutional jurisdiction in the protection of the fundamental rights guaranteed in the Constitution, even if this involved judging political issues . In other words, there have been cases in which the Supreme Court has acted in an activist way, especially in the protection of fundamental rights, although at other times it has acted in the opposite direction, as in the Lochner Era, in a conservative position. |
|---|