O Judicial Review e o ativismo judicial da Suprema Corte americana na proteção de direitos fundamentais

dialnet-ar-18-ART0001368163

dialnet

dialnet-ar-18-ART00013681632020-03-13O Judicial Review e o ativismo judicial da Suprema Corte americana na proteção de direitos fundamentaisde Queiroz Barboza, Estefânia MariaKozicki, Katyaativismo judicialSuprema CorteEstados UnidosJudicial ReviewJudicial activismSupreme Court of the United StatesJudicial ReviewThis article analyses the historical origins of judicial review in the United States since the Marbury v. Madison to Burger Court, as well as the reflections of its conception in the socalled American “judicial activism”, which ended up prioritizing the role of the constitutional jurisdiction in the protection of the fundamental rights guaranteed in the Constitution, even if this involved judging political issues . In other words, there have been cases in which the Supreme Court has acted in an activist way, especially in the protection of fundamental rights, although at other times it has acted in the opposite direction, as in the Lochner Era, in a conservative position.No presente artigo examinaramse as origens históricas do judicial review nos Estados Unidos da América desde o caso Marbury v. Madison até a Corte Burger, bem como os reflexos de sua concepção no chamado “ativismo judicial” norteamericano, o qual acabou por priorizar o papel da jurisdição constitucional na proteção dos direitos fundamentais garantidos na Constituição, mesmo que isso implicasse enfrentar questões tipicamente políticas. Ou seja, apresentaramse casos nos quais a Suprema Corte atuou de forma ativista especialmente na proteção de direitos fundamentais, embora em outros momentos tenha atuado justamente no sentido contrário, como na Era Lochner, numa postura conservadora em relação à proteção de direitos.2016text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7277454(Revista) ISSN 1519-5899(Revista) ISSN 2179-7943Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law, ISSN 2179-7943, Vol. 17, Nº. 3, 2016 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law [EJJL] | Quadrimestral), pags. 733-752porLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI

Dialnet

Dialnet AR

Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law, ISSN 2179-7943, Vol. 17, Nº. 3, 2016 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law [EJJL] | Quadrimestral), pags. 733-752

Portuguese

ativismo judicial
Suprema Corte
Estados Unidos
Judicial Review
Judicial activism
Supreme Court of the United States
Judicial Review

ativismo judicial
Suprema Corte
Estados Unidos
Judicial Review
Judicial activism
Supreme Court of the United States
Judicial Review
de Queiroz Barboza, Estefânia Maria
Kozicki, Katya
O Judicial Review e o ativismo judicial da Suprema Corte americana na proteção de direitos fundamentais

This article analyses the historical origins of judicial review in the United States since the Marbury v. Madison to Burger Court, as well as the reflections of its conception in the socalled American “judicial activism”, which ended up prioritizing the role of the constitutional jurisdiction in the protection of the fundamental rights guaranteed in the Constitution, even if this involved judging political issues . In other words, there have been cases in which the Supreme Court has acted in an activist way, especially in the protection of fundamental rights, although at other times it has acted in the opposite direction, as in the Lochner Era, in a conservative position.

Article

de Queiroz Barboza, Estefânia Maria
Kozicki, Katya

de Queiroz Barboza, Estefânia Maria
Kozicki, Katya

de Queiroz Barboza, Estefânia Maria

O Judicial Review e o ativismo judicial da Suprema Corte americana na proteção de direitos fundamentais

O Judicial Review e o ativismo judicial da Suprema Corte americana na proteção de direitos fundamentais

O Judicial Review e o ativismo judicial da Suprema Corte americana na proteção de direitos fundamentais

O Judicial Review e o ativismo judicial da Suprema Corte americana na proteção de direitos fundamentais

O Judicial Review e o ativismo judicial da Suprema Corte americana na proteção de direitos fundamentais

o judicial review e o ativismo judicial da suprema corte americana na proteção de direitos fundamentais

2016

https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7277454

1709751524575412224