O Judicial Review e o ativismo judicial da Suprema Corte americana na proteção de direitos fundamentais

This article analyses the historical origins of judicial review in the United States since the Marbury v. Madison to Burger Court, as well as the reflections of its conception in the socalled American “judicial activism”, which ended up prioritizing the role of the constitutional jurisdiction in the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: de Queiroz Barboza, Estefânia Maria, Kozicki, Katya
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: 2016
Subjects:
ativismo judicial
Suprema Corte
Estados Unidos
Judicial Review
Judicial activism
Supreme Court of the United States
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7277454
Source:Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law, ISSN 2179-7943, Vol. 17, Nº. 3, 2016 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law [EJJL] | Quadrimestral), pags. 733-752
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
O Judicial Review e o ativismo judicial da Suprema Corte americana na proteção de direitos fundamentais
Summary: This article analyses the historical origins of judicial review in the United States since the Marbury v. Madison to Burger Court, as well as the reflections of its conception in the socalled American “judicial activism”, which ended up prioritizing the role of the constitutional jurisdiction in the protection of the fundamental rights guaranteed in the Constitution, even if this involved judging political issues . In other words, there have been cases in which the Supreme Court has acted in an activist way, especially in the protection of fundamental rights, although at other times it has acted in the opposite direction, as in the Lochner Era, in a conservative position.

Similar Items