As audiências públicas no STF: a adoção de um modelo cooperativo de controle de constitucionalidade das normas

This paper to examine the thesis about the interpreters of the Constitution, the pluralization of the debate and the constitutional process. The starting point for such a study is due to the recent positions taken by the Supreme Court (STF) based on democratic participation in their decisions. The s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Oliveira, Jadson Correia de, Silva, Ivan Luiz da, Amorim, Fernando Sérgio Tenório de
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6566796
Source:Seqüência: estudos jurídicos e políticos, ISSN 2177-7055, Vol. 39, Nº. 78, 2018, pags. 175-198
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
Summary: This paper to examine the thesis about the interpreters of the Constitution, the pluralization of the debate and the constitutional process. The starting point for such a study is due to the recent positions taken by the Supreme Court (STF) based on democratic participation in their decisions. The study presents each of the major themes of the interpreters of the Constitution, in order not to fossilize the law and/or not allowing that it be far away from the whole society. By logical consequence, it is mandatory to near law and society. This happens due to the occurence of such activity at the level of problematic interpretation issue, which permeates the concerning results