La racionalidad de la ponderación en la argumentación constitucional
This article defends a way to bypass the objection that the weighting is irrational. To do this, it is argued that it should be understood as a simple "formal structure" for the analysis of judicial decisions rendered in cases of disputes over rights. However, it does not imply that in thi...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Idioma: | Castellano |
| Publicado: |
2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5820614 |
| Fuente: | Revista Prolegómenos. Derechos y Valores de la Facultad de Derecho, ISSN 0121-182X, Vol. 20, Nº. 39, 2017, pags. 73-85 |
| Etiquetas: |
Añadir etiqueta
Sin etiquetas: Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro
|
| Sumario: |
This article defends a way to bypass the objection that the weighting is irrational. To do this, it is argued that it should be understood as a simple "formal structure" for the analysis of judicial decisions rendered in cases of disputes over rights. However, it does not imply that in this field there do not exist possibilities to the discretion and the subjective judgements. |
|---|