La racionalidad de la ponderación en la argumentación constitucional

This article defends a way to bypass the objection that the weighting is irrational. To do this, it is argued that it should be understood as a simple "formal structure" for the analysis of judicial decisions rendered in cases of disputes over rights. However, it does not imply that in thi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mocoroa, Juan Manuel
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Weighting
conflict of rights
argumentative rationality
judicial discretion
Ponderación
conflicto de derechos
racionalidad argumentativa
discrecionalidad judicial
Ponderação
conflito de direitos
racionalidade argumentativa
discricionariedade judicial
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5820614
Source:Revista Prolegómenos. Derechos y Valores de la Facultad de Derecho, ISSN 0121-182X, Vol. 20, Nº. 39, 2017, pags. 73-85
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
La racionalidad de la ponderación en la argumentación constitucional
Summary: This article defends a way to bypass the objection that the weighting is irrational. To do this, it is argued that it should be understood as a simple "formal structure" for the analysis of judicial decisions rendered in cases of disputes over rights. However, it does not imply that in this field there do not exist possibilities to the discretion and the subjective judgements. 

Similar Items