Comentários à nova lei de reforma do Processo de Execução n. 11.232, de 22/12/2005.
The objective of this study is to demonstrate that the procedures governing Execution Proceedings have been undergoing profound transformations to ensure their effectiveness and usefulness to those who seek this remedy from the courts. For a long time, the concept of independent and autonomous execu...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| Published: |
Universidade FUMEC, Faculdade de Ciências Humanas, Sociais e da Saúde
2007
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4047615 |
| Source: | Meritum, ISSN 2238-6939, Vol. 2, Nº. 2, 2007, pags. 301-334 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0000509086
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00005090862016-04-13Comentários à nova lei de reforma do Processo de Execução n. 11.232, de 22/12/2005.Maciel Santos, LílianProcesso de execuçãoExecução dos títulos judiciaisEntrega de coisa certa ou incertaObrigação de fazer e não fazerExecution proceedingExecution of court judgementsExecution of thing certain or thing uncertain - Obligation to do or not to doThe objective of this study is to demonstrate that the procedures governing Execution Proceedings have been undergoing profound transformations to ensure their effectiveness and usefulness to those who seek this remedy from the courts. For a long time, the concept of independent and autonomous execution proceedings was formalized. This concept meant that a new lawsuit was begun after the main lawsuit was concluded, in the case of execution of court judgments. Without underestimating the importance of execution proceedings, Law No. 11.232/2005 placed the execution of court judgments into the main lawsuit, benefiting the so-called �syncretic proceedings.� In this type of procedure, an execution is performed within the scope of the main lawsuit. Without a doubt, this leads to a much faster resolution of conflicts. Law No.11.232/2005 consolidated reforms in the scope of execution that had occurred for executions of �thing certain or thing uncertain� and �obligation to do or not to do.� Thus, the only separate execution proceedings that remained were those to �pay sum certain�, which the new law has now covered. This is what we have analyzed in this simple study.O objetivo com este trabalho é demonstrar que o processo de execução vem sofrendo profundas transformações com o intuito de dar eficácia e ser útil ao jurisdicionado. Sacramentou-se por muito tempo a concepção de um processo de execução independente e autônomo que, para tanto, inaugurava uma nova ação, findo o processo de conhecimento, no caso dos títulos judiciais. Sem desmerecer a importância do processo de execução, a Lei n. 11.232/2005 veio inserir a execução dos títulos judiciais no processo de conhecimento, enaltecendo as chamadas ações sincréticas, nas quais, ao mesmo tempo em que se conhece, se executa, o que proporciona, sem sombra de dúvida, a tão desejada celeridade. A Lei n. 11.232/ 2005 veio consolidar reformas no âmbito da execução que já tinham ocorrido nas execuções para entrega de coisa certa ou incerta, fazer e não fazer. Remanesciam, ainda, sem alterações tão-somente as execuções para pagamento de quantia certa, o que agora a nova lei veio proporcionar. É que se buscará analisar neste singelo estudo.Universidade FUMEC, Faculdade de Ciências Humanas, Sociais e da Saúde2007text (article)application/pdfhttp://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4047615(Revista) ISSN 2238-6939Meritum, ISSN 2238-6939, Vol. 2, Nº. 2, 2007, pags. 301-334porLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Meritum, ISSN 2238-6939, Vol. 2, Nº. 2, 2007, pags. 301-334
|
| language |
Portuguese
|
| topic |
Processo de execução
Execução dos títulos judiciais Entrega de coisa certa ou incerta Obrigação de fazer e não fazer Execution proceeding Execution of court judgements Execution of thing certain or thing uncertain - Obligation to do or not to do |
| spellingShingle |
Processo de execução
Execução dos títulos judiciais Entrega de coisa certa ou incerta Obrigação de fazer e não fazer Execution proceeding Execution of court judgements Execution of thing certain or thing uncertain - Obligation to do or not to do Maciel Santos, Lílian Comentários à nova lei de reforma do Processo de Execução n. 11.232, de 22/12/2005. |
| description |
The objective of this study is to demonstrate that the
procedures governing Execution Proceedings have been undergoing
profound transformations to ensure their effectiveness and
usefulness to those who seek this remedy from the courts. For a
long time, the concept of independent and autonomous execution
proceedings was formalized. This concept meant that a new lawsuit
was begun after the main lawsuit was concluded, in the case of
execution of court judgments. Without underestimating the
importance of execution proceedings, Law No. 11.232/2005 placed
the execution of court judgments into the main lawsuit, benefiting
the so-called �syncretic proceedings.� In this type of procedure, an
execution is performed within the scope of the main lawsuit.
Without a doubt, this leads to a much faster resolution of conflicts.
Law No.11.232/2005 consolidated reforms in the scope of execution
that had occurred for executions of �thing certain or thing uncertain�
and �obligation to do or not to do.� Thus, the only separate execution
proceedings that remained were those to �pay sum certain�, which
the new law has now covered. This is what we have analyzed in
this simple study.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Maciel Santos, Lílian
|
| author_facet |
Maciel Santos, Lílian
|
| author_sort |
Maciel Santos, Lílian
|
| title |
Comentários à nova lei de reforma do Processo de Execução n. 11.232, de 22/12/2005.
|
| title_short |
Comentários à nova lei de reforma do Processo de Execução n. 11.232, de 22/12/2005.
|
| title_full |
Comentários à nova lei de reforma do Processo de Execução n. 11.232, de 22/12/2005.
|
| title_fullStr |
Comentários à nova lei de reforma do Processo de Execução n. 11.232, de 22/12/2005.
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Comentários à nova lei de reforma do Processo de Execução n. 11.232, de 22/12/2005.
|
| title_sort |
comentários à nova lei de reforma do processo de execução n. 11.232, de 22/12/2005.
|
| publisher |
Universidade FUMEC, Faculdade de Ciências Humanas, Sociais e da Saúde
|
| publishDate |
2007
|
| url |
http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4047615
|
| _version_ |
1709710701834010624
|