Deontología profesional en salud, para algunos, no para todos
Using qualitative methodology and from the reconstruction of legal normative sources, the aim was to expose the discriminatory and unjustified tratment that some formulators and executors of public policy have given to health care professions that directly compromises the excercise of the profession...
Gorde:
| Egile nagusia: | |
|---|---|
| Formatua: | Artikulua |
| Hizkuntza: | Gaztelania |
| Argitaratua: |
2021
|
| Gaiak: | |
| Sarrera elektronikoa: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=9054734 |
| Baliabidea: | Misión Jurídica: Revista de derecho y ciencias sociales, ISSN 1794-600X, Vol. 14, Nº. 21, 2021 |
| Etiketak: |
Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe: Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001618755
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Misión Jurídica: Revista de derecho y ciencias sociales, ISSN 1794-600X, Vol. 14, Nº. 21, 2021
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
Deontology
Human Talent in Healthcare inclusión court financing Deontología Talento Humano en Salud (THS) inclusión tribunales financiación |
| spellingShingle |
Deontology
Human Talent in Healthcare inclusión court financing Deontología Talento Humano en Salud (THS) inclusión tribunales financiación Hincapié Cetina, Diana Deontología profesional en salud, para algunos, no para todos |
| description |
Using qualitative methodology and from the reconstruction of legal normative sources, the aim was to expose the discriminatory and unjustified tratment that some formulators and executors of public policy have given to health care professions that directly compromises the excercise of the professional autonomy constitutionaly consacrated and reduces them to inequitable budget assignments. The financing of deontologic tribunals intended in laws of ordinary and organic nature to only three of thirteen prefessions whose graduates are considered Human Talent in Healthcare (THS) despite they have their own law of professional exercise that foresees deontologic control, allows to question the effective guarentee of professional exercise guided by constitutionally harmonized principles and values, of the societies and communities in which they provide their personal healthcare services. The surveillance and control by the State is limited to the logics of quality assurance of the General Healthcare Security System (SGSS) but do not promote the human relationship of the professional act, hence the questioning of the possibility of deontology for all and not only for some, which has even been projected to the recent revocation of the delegation of public functions of healthcare professional colleges via the exceeding of exceptional faculties granted to the National Government.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Hincapié Cetina, Diana
|
| author_facet |
Hincapié Cetina, Diana
|
| author_sort |
Hincapié Cetina, Diana
|
| title |
Deontología profesional en salud, para algunos, no para todos
|
| title_short |
Deontología profesional en salud, para algunos, no para todos
|
| title_full |
Deontología profesional en salud, para algunos, no para todos
|
| title_fullStr |
Deontología profesional en salud, para algunos, no para todos
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Deontología profesional en salud, para algunos, no para todos
|
| title_sort |
deontología profesional en salud, para algunos, no para todos
|
| publishDate |
2021
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=9054734
|
| _version_ |
1798901136348938240
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00016187552023-08-23Deontología profesional en salud, para algunos, no para todosHincapié Cetina, DianaDeontologyHuman Talent in HealthcareinclusióncourtfinancingDeontologíaTalento Humano en Salud (THS)inclusióntribunalesfinanciaciónUsing qualitative methodology and from the reconstruction of legal normative sources, the aim was to expose the discriminatory and unjustified tratment that some formulators and executors of public policy have given to health care professions that directly compromises the excercise of the professional autonomy constitutionaly consacrated and reduces them to inequitable budget assignments. The financing of deontologic tribunals intended in laws of ordinary and organic nature to only three of thirteen prefessions whose graduates are considered Human Talent in Healthcare (THS) despite they have their own law of professional exercise that foresees deontologic control, allows to question the effective guarentee of professional exercise guided by constitutionally harmonized principles and values, of the societies and communities in which they provide their personal healthcare services. The surveillance and control by the State is limited to the logics of quality assurance of the General Healthcare Security System (SGSS) but do not promote the human relationship of the professional act, hence the questioning of the possibility of deontology for all and not only for some, which has even been projected to the recent revocation of the delegation of public functions of healthcare professional colleges via the exceeding of exceptional faculties granted to the National Government.Atendiendo a la metodología cualitativa y desde la reconstrucción de fuentes normativas jurídicas, se pretendió dar cuenta del tratamiento discriminado e injustificado, que algunos formuladores y ejecutores de política pública han dado a las profesiones del área de la salud, lo que compromete directamente el ejercicio de la autonomía profesional consagrada constitucionalmente y, la reduce a asignaciones presupuestales inequitativas. La financiación de tribunales deontológicos, prevista en leyes de naturaleza ordinaria y orgánica, a solo tres profesiones de las trece, cuyos egresados se consideran Talento Humano en Salud (THS), pese a que cuentan con su respectiva ley de ejercicio que prevé control deontológico, permite cuestionar la garantía efectiva de un ejercicio profesional orientado por principios y valores, armonizados constitucionalmente, de las sociedades y comunidades, en las que brindan sus servicios personales en salud. La vigilancia y control que el Estado realiza se limita a las lógicas de aseguramiento de la calidad del Sistema General de Seguridad en Salud (SGSS), más no promueven la relación humana del acto profesional, de ahí el cuestionamiento a la condición de posibilidad de deontología para todos, y no para algunos, que incluso, se ha proyectado a la reciente revocación de delegación de funciones públicas a los colegios profesionales en salud, vía extralimitación de facultades excepcionales otorgadas al Gobierno Nacional.2021text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=9054734(Revista) ISSN 1794-600XMisión Jurídica: Revista de derecho y ciencias sociales, ISSN 1794-600X, Vol. 14, Nº. 21, 2021spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|