La ruta indirecta para asegurar los intereses de los consumidores y competidores bajo el derecho de la competencia de la Unión Europea
The theme of the present article is to deliver the notion that in order to enforce competition rules which, are aimed at maintaining a balance between profitability of the competitors and welfare of the consumers, the crucial aspect in attainting it is a healthy competitive market. Therefore, an att...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=9054712 |
| Source: | Misión Jurídica: Revista de derecho y ciencias sociales, ISSN 1794-600X, Vol. 13, Nº. 19, 2020 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001618733
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Misión Jurídica: Revista de derecho y ciencias sociales, ISSN 1794-600X, Vol. 13, Nº. 19, 2020
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
EU Competition Law
Consumer Welfare Competitors Market Structure Object- Effect Dichotomy Derecho de la Competencia de la Unión Europea Bienestar del consumidor Competidores Estructura del mercado Dicotomía objeto-efecto Direito da Concorrência da UE Bem-estar do consumidor Concorrentes Estrutura de mercado Dicotomia objeto-efeito |
| spellingShingle |
EU Competition Law
Consumer Welfare Competitors Market Structure Object- Effect Dichotomy Derecho de la Competencia de la Unión Europea Bienestar del consumidor Competidores Estructura del mercado Dicotomía objeto-efecto Direito da Concorrência da UE Bem-estar do consumidor Concorrentes Estrutura de mercado Dicotomia objeto-efeito Bhatt, Krusha La ruta indirecta para asegurar los intereses de los consumidores y competidores bajo el derecho de la competencia de la Unión Europea |
| description |
The theme of the present article is to deliver the notion that in order to enforce competition rules which, are aimed at maintaining a balance between profitability of the competitors and welfare of the consumers, the crucial aspect in attainting it is a healthy competitive market. Therefore, an attempt is made to analyses the role and practice of the European Courts and the Commission in protecting the structure of the competitive market as a means to secure the interests of the consumers and competitors. To convey the notion of the paper, sustenance from one of the imperative decisions given by the European Court of Justice purporting the predominant idea has been taken from the case of GlaxoSmithKline v Commission1 and other relevant cases from the locales of Article 101 coupled with Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. The idea is to critically discuss the rationale of the decision delivered by the hierarchy of courts, the object-effect dichotomy under Article 101(1) for apprehending anti- competitive conduct, and to reflect upon the Commission guidelines.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Bhatt, Krusha
|
| author_facet |
Bhatt, Krusha
|
| author_sort |
Bhatt, Krusha
|
| title |
La ruta indirecta para asegurar los intereses de los consumidores y competidores bajo el derecho de la competencia de la Unión Europea
|
| title_short |
La ruta indirecta para asegurar los intereses de los consumidores y competidores bajo el derecho de la competencia de la Unión Europea
|
| title_full |
La ruta indirecta para asegurar los intereses de los consumidores y competidores bajo el derecho de la competencia de la Unión Europea
|
| title_fullStr |
La ruta indirecta para asegurar los intereses de los consumidores y competidores bajo el derecho de la competencia de la Unión Europea
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
La ruta indirecta para asegurar los intereses de los consumidores y competidores bajo el derecho de la competencia de la Unión Europea
|
| title_sort |
la ruta indirecta para asegurar los intereses de los consumidores y competidores bajo el derecho de la competencia de la unión europea
|
| publishDate |
2020
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=9054712
|
| _version_ |
1798810549070331904
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00016187332023-08-23La ruta indirecta para asegurar los intereses de los consumidores y competidores bajo el derecho de la competencia de la Unión EuropeaBhatt, KrushaEU Competition LawConsumer WelfareCompetitorsMarket StructureObject- Effect DichotomyDerecho de la Competencia de la Unión EuropeaBienestar del consumidorCompetidoresEstructura del mercadoDicotomía objeto-efectoDireito da Concorrência da UEBem-estar do consumidorConcorrentesEstrutura de mercadoDicotomia objeto-efeitoThe theme of the present article is to deliver the notion that in order to enforce competition rules which, are aimed at maintaining a balance between profitability of the competitors and welfare of the consumers, the crucial aspect in attainting it is a healthy competitive market. Therefore, an attempt is made to analyses the role and practice of the European Courts and the Commission in protecting the structure of the competitive market as a means to secure the interests of the consumers and competitors. To convey the notion of the paper, sustenance from one of the imperative decisions given by the European Court of Justice purporting the predominant idea has been taken from the case of GlaxoSmithKline v Commission1 and other relevant cases from the locales of Article 101 coupled with Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. The idea is to critically discuss the rationale of the decision delivered by the hierarchy of courts, the object-effect dichotomy under Article 101(1) for apprehending anti- competitive conduct, and to reflect upon the Commission guidelines.O tema do presente artigo é transmitir a noção de que para fazer cumprir as regras de concorrência que, visam manter o equilíbrio entre a rentabilidade dos concorrentes e o bem-estar dos consumidores, o aspecto crucial para a sua concretização é um mercado competitivo saudável. Por conseguinte, procura-se analisar o papel e a prática dos Tribunais Europeus e da Comissão na proteção da estrutura do mercado competitivo como meio de salvaguardar os interesses dos consumidores e concorrentes. Para transmitir a noção do documento, o fundamento é uma das decisões imperativas proferidas pelo Tribunal de Justiça das Comunidades Europeias, alegando a ideia predominante, foi tirada do processo GlaxoSmithKline / Comissão e outros casos relevantes das localidades do artigo 101.º juntamente com o artigo 102.º do Tratado sobre o Funcionamento da União Europeia. A ideia é discutir criticamente a razão de ser da decisão proferida pela hierarquia dos tribunais, a dicotomia objeto-efeito nos termos do artigo 101.º, n.º 1, para a apreensão de comportamentos anticoncorrenciais, e refletir sobre as orientações da Comissão El tema de este artículo es dar una noción, para poder fortalecer las reglas de competitividad que apuntan a mantener un balance entre la rentabilidad de los competidores y el bienestar de los consumidores, cuyo aspecto crucial es conseguir un mercado competitivo y sano. Entonces, se realiza un intento por analizar el rol y la práctica de las Cortes Europeas y la Comisión al proteger la estructura de un mercado competitivo como medio para asegurar los intereses de los comsumidores y competidores. Para expresar el concepto de esta investigación, se sustenta en una de las decisiones imperativas tomadas por la Corte Europea de Justicia que, avalando la idea predominante, ha sido tomada del caso de GlaxoSmithKline contra la Comisión y otros casos relevantes de los locales del Artículo 101 junto con el Artículo 102 del Tratado del Funcionamiento de la Unión Europea. La idea es discutir de manera crítica el fundamento de la decision dictada por la jerarquía de tribunales, la dicotomía objeto-efecto bajo el Artículo 101(1) por aprehender conductas anticompetitivas y, además, reflexionar sobre las directrices de la Comisión.2020text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=9054712(Revista) ISSN 1794-600XMisión Jurídica: Revista de derecho y ciencias sociales, ISSN 1794-600X, Vol. 13, Nº. 19, 2020spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|