Prohibición de revisión de las actuaciones del Consejo de Participación Ciudadana y Control Social Transitorio

Opinion No. 2-19-IC / 19 issued by the Constitutional Court of Ecuador is analyzed, which prohibits the definitive Participation Council from reviewing the actions of the Transitory Participation Council. This prohibition not only restricts the power to review its own actions, but also opens the pos...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carpio Pinos, Manolo Eduardo, Erazo Álvarez, Juan Carlos, Guerra Coronel, Marcelo Alejandro, Narváez Zurita, Ivonne
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8964705
Source:Iustitia Socialis: Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Criminalísticas, ISSN 2542-3371, Vol. 5, Nº. 1 (Edición Especial), 2020, pags. 330-355
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
Summary: Opinion No. 2-19-IC / 19 issued by the Constitutional Court of Ecuador is analyzed, which prohibits the definitive Participation Council from reviewing the actions of the Transitory Participation Council. This prohibition not only restricts the power to review its own actions, but also opens the possibility for future abuses of political power under the pretext of creating transition regimes. The objective of the present investigation is to determine if the decision of the Constitutional Court responds to political or legal criteria. For this, an investigation is carried out with a qualitative scientific research methodology, which is based on the use of methods such as inductive-deductive, historical-logical. The conclusion obtained is that, Opinion No. 2-19-IC / 19 is based on political criteria because the interpretation action is denatured and it is evidenced that the constitutional body exceeds the powers granted by the Constitution of Ecuador.