Eficacia de la activación del hipoclorito de sodio mediante el uso de ultrasonido sónico y ultrasónico. Revisión Bibliográfica
Ultrasonic activation is currently the most widely used during endodontic practice, it has a vibratory effect with ranges ranging from 25 to 30 kHz, thus generating nodes and antinodes against the canal walls. Therefore, it has been postulated that ultrasonic activation is better than sonic activati...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8829604 |
| Source: | RECIMUNDO: Revista Científica de la Investigación y el Conocimiento, ISSN 2588-073X, Vol. 7, Nº. 1, 2023, pags. 55-62 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| Summary: |
Ultrasonic activation is currently the most widely used during endodontic practice, it has a vibratory effect with ranges ranging from 25 to 30 kHz, thus generating nodes and antinodes against the canal walls. Therefore, it has been postulated that ultrasonic activation is better than sonic activation for the removal of both organic and inorganic material. This research contains documentary bibliographic review information. The technique for data collection is made up of printed and electronic materials, the latter such as Google Scholar, Scielo, PubMed, among others. Despite the fact that ultrasonic activation is more widely accepted than sonic, there are multiple studies where no significant differences are found as to which technique is better, which will depend on many factors such as the type of dental piece, its handling, for which type of pathology is going to be used, among others, which suggests that experimental studies must continue to be carried out to determine with greater precision which activation method is better or definitively if both are better. |
|---|