El silencio de las partes en el marco de su comparecencia personal ante los tribunales civiles y la aducida inconstitucionalidad del art. 72 de la Ley 834 de 1978
The incidence of the ficta confessio or presumed confession is analyzed within the framework of application of art. 72 of L. 834-78 and its non- conflict, with respect to civil procedure, neither with the constitutional principle of non-self-incrimination nor with the notion of due process. It is ar...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8500597 |
Source: | Saber y Justicia, ISSN 2305-2589, Vol. 2, Nº. 20, 2021 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Saber y Justicia), pags. 36-43 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
Summary: |
The incidence of the ficta confessio or presumed confession is analyzed within the framework of application of art. 72 of L. 834-78 and its non- conflict, with respect to civil procedure, neither with the constitutional principle of non-self-incrimination nor with the notion of due process. It is argued that silence or elusive responses during the written test phase do not necessarily affect the right of defense or contradict the principle of non-selfincrimination, as well as that such an attitude may be justified at a certain moment. |
---|