Judicial control as a guarantee of non-interference in private life during the pretrial investigation: An observation under the European Court of Human Rights

dialnet-ar-18-ART0001511830

dialnet

Dialnet

Dialnet AR

DIXI, ISSN 0124-7255, null 23, Nº. 2 (julio-diciembre), 2021

English

judicial control
non-interference
private life
pre-trial investigation
European Court of Human Rights
Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos
control judicial
no injerencia
investigación previa al juicio
vida privada
Tribunal Europeu de Direitos Humanos
controle judicial
não-interferência
investigação pré-julgamento
vida privada

judicial control
non-interference
private life
pre-trial investigation
European Court of Human Rights
Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos
control judicial
no injerencia
investigación previa al juicio
vida privada
Tribunal Europeu de Direitos Humanos
controle judicial
não-interferência
investigação pré-julgamento
vida privada
Galagan, Volodymyr I.
Ablamskyi, Serhii Ye.
Udovenko, Zhаnnа V.
Ablamska, Victoria V.
Judicial control as a guarantee of non-interference in private life during the pretrial investigation: An observation under the European Court of Human Rights

The article is devoted to the topical issue of judicial control over non-interference in the private (personal and family) life of participants in criminal proceedings. The study was conducted in the context of the analysis of the practice of the ECHR, the legal positions of which should be consistently applied in criminal proceedings, evidence of this are the legal requirements on this issue. The notion and concept of judicial control is a necessity component that helps in guaranteeing the respect of human dignity and integrity. It is a common and established principle that, during the pre-trial process, it is the position of those ensuring justice in making sure that the life of persons is respected and safeguarded. It is noted that in accordance with the national legislation of Ukraine, judicial control is a separate function of the court's activities at the stage of pre-trial investigation, directly carried out by the investigating judge. The situation will become precarious and detrimental when the private life of persons is not respected to the fullest. Therefore, it is the responsibility of those ensuring public order during the pre-trial investigation phase in ensuring the respect of the private life of the presumed suspect for the proper implementation of the justice process. In ensuring this right, it is established that the empirical and analytical methods of research are necessary in order to show the effective role played by the European Court of Human Rights in respecting the right to private life during the interrogative phase of inquiry. From the findings, it is seen that, though the Court has played a prominent and pertinent role in the respect of private, the suspect continues in experiencing difficulties when it's private life is at at stake, and it always affects the extent of the justice system.

Article

Galagan, Volodymyr I.
Ablamskyi, Serhii Ye.
Udovenko, Zhаnnа V.
Ablamska, Victoria V.

Galagan, Volodymyr I.
Ablamskyi, Serhii Ye.
Udovenko, Zhаnnа V.
Ablamska, Victoria V.

Galagan, Volodymyr I.

Judicial control as a guarantee of non-interference in private life during the pretrial investigation: An observation under the European Court of Human Rights

Judicial control as a guarantee of non-interference in private life during the pretrial investigation: An observation under the European Court of Human Rights

Judicial control as a guarantee of non-interference in private life during the pretrial investigation: An observation under the European Court of Human Rights

Judicial control as a guarantee of non-interference in private life during the pretrial investigation: An observation under the European Court of Human Rights

Judicial control as a guarantee of non-interference in private life during the pretrial investigation: An observation under the European Court of Human Rights

judicial control as a guarantee of non-interference in private life during the pretrial investigation: an observation under the european court of human rights

2021

https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8296458

1725498561347452928

dialnet-ar-18-ART00015118302022-02-20Judicial control as a guarantee of non-interference in private life during the pretrial investigation: An observation under the European Court of Human RightsGalagan, Volodymyr I.Ablamskyi, Serhii Ye.Udovenko, Zhаnnа V.Ablamska, Victoria V.judicial controlnon-interferenceprivate lifepre-trial investigationEuropean Court of Human RightsTribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanoscontrol judicialno injerenciainvestigación previa al juiciovida privadaTribunal Europeu de Direitos Humanoscontrole judicialnão-interferênciainvestigação pré-julgamentovida privadaThe article is devoted to the topical issue of judicial control over non-interference in the private (personal and family) life of participants in criminal proceedings. The study was conducted in the context of the analysis of the practice of the ECHR, the legal positions of which should be consistently applied in criminal proceedings, evidence of this are the legal requirements on this issue. The notion and concept of judicial control is a necessity component that helps in guaranteeing the respect of human dignity and integrity. It is a common and established principle that, during the pre-trial process, it is the position of those ensuring justice in making sure that the life of persons is respected and safeguarded. It is noted that in accordance with the national legislation of Ukraine, judicial control is a separate function of the court's activities at the stage of pre-trial investigation, directly carried out by the investigating judge. The situation will become precarious and detrimental when the private life of persons is not respected to the fullest. Therefore, it is the responsibility of those ensuring public order during the pre-trial investigation phase in ensuring the respect of the private life of the presumed suspect for the proper implementation of the justice process. In ensuring this right, it is established that the empirical and analytical methods of research are necessary in order to show the effective role played by the European Court of Human Rights in respecting the right to private life during the interrogative phase of inquiry. From the findings, it is seen that, though the Court has played a prominent and pertinent role in the respect of private, the suspect continues in experiencing difficulties when it's private life is at at stake, and it always affects the extent of the justice system.O artigo é dedicado à questão atual do controle judicial sobre a não-interferência na vida privada (pessoal e familiar) dos participantes em processos criminais. O estudo foi conduzido no contexto da análise da prática da Corte Européia de Direitos Humanos, cujas posições legais devem ser aplicadas consistentemente em pro-cessos criminais; a prova disto são as exigências legais sobre esta questão. A noção e o conceito de controle judicial é um componente necessário que ajuda a garantir o respeito à dignidade e integridade humanas. É um princípio comum e estabelecido que, durante o processo de pré-julgamento, é a posição daqueles que garantem a justiça ao assegurar que a vida das pessoas seja respeitada e salvaguardada. Observa-se que, de acordo com a legislação nacional da Ucrânia, o controle judicial é uma função separada das atividades do tribunal na fase de investigação pré-julgamento, realizada diretamente pelo juiz investigador. A situação se tornará precária e prejudicial quando a vida privada das pessoas não for respeitada ao máximo. Portanto, é responsabilidade daqueles que asseguram a ordem pública durante a fase de investigação pré-jul-gamento assegurar o respeito à vida privada do presumível suspeito para a correta implementação do pro-cesso de justiça. Ao assegurar este direito, estabelece-se que os métodos empíricos e analíticos de pesquisa são necessários, a fim de mostrar o papel efetivo desempenhado pela Corte Européia de Direitos Humanos no respeito ao direito à vida privada durante a fase interrogativa de investigação. A partir das constatações, verifica-se que, embora a Corte tenha desempenhado um papel proeminente e pertinente no respeito à vida privada, o suspeito continua passando por dificuldades quando sua vida privada está em jogo e isso sempre afeta a extensão do sistema de justiça.El artículo está dedicado a la cuestión de actualidad del control judicial sobre la no injerencia en la vida privada (personal y familiar) de los participantes en los procesos penales. El estudio se ha realizado en el contexto del análisis de la práctica del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos, cuyas posiciones jurídicas deben aplicarse de forma coherente en los procesos penales; prueba de ello son los requisitos legales sobre esta cuestión. La noción y el concepto de control judicial es un componente necesario que contribuye a garantizar el respeto de la dignidad y la integridad humanas. Es un principio común y establecido que, durante el proceso previo al juicio, es la posición de aquellos que aseguran la justicia en hacer que la vida de las personas sea respetada y salvaguardada. Cabe señalar que, de acuerdo con la legislación nacional de Ucrania, el control judicial es una función separada de las actividades del tribunal en la fase de investigación previa al juicio, llevada a cabo directamente por el juez de instrucción. La situación será precaria y perjudicial cuando no se respete al máximo la vida privada de las personas. Por lo tanto, es responsabilidad de quienes velan por el orden público durante la fase de investigación previa al juicio garantizar el respeto de la vida privada del presunto sospechoso para el correcto desarrollo del proceso de justicia. Para garantizar este derecho, se establece que los métodos empíricos y analíticos de la investiga-ción son necesarios, con el fin de mostrar el papel efectivo desempeñado por el Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos en el respeto del derecho a la vida privada durante la fase de interrogatorio de la investigación. De las conclusiones se desprende que, aunque el Tribunal ha desempeñado un papel destacado y pertinente en el respeto de la vida privada, el sospechoso sigue experimentando dificultades cuando su vida privada está en juego, y ello afecta siempre al alcance del sistema judicial2021text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8296458(Revista) ISSN 0124-7255DIXI, ISSN 0124-7255, null 23, Nº. 2 (julio-diciembre), 2021engLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI