Las emergencias constitucionales no regladas o insuficientemente regladas: una aproximación teórico-práctica
Together with the usual legal disputes, dealt with through the standard legal instruments, certain situations sometimes arise which threaten the continuity of the constitutional order and require the application of extraordinary measures. These are scenarios that imply a greater concentration of pow...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
2021
|
Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8187286 |
Source: | Teoría y realidad constitucional, ISSN 1139-5583, Nº 48, 2021, pags. 495-524 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
Summary: |
Together with the usual legal disputes, dealt with through the standard legal instruments,
certain situations sometimes arise which threaten the continuity of the constitutional order and require the
application of extraordinary measures. These are scenarios that imply a greater concentration of power but still
require respect for certain basic legal premises in order to prevent authoritarian behaviours. Since non-regulated or insufficiently regulated emergencies are the most extreme example of this, in the first part of the paper
we will see that, even in these cases of true exception, there are sufficient legal criteria to confront danger with
guarantees. We will then look at the way in which Spanish public authorities have applied such parameters
with clearly positive outcomes and others that have been rather controversial. Crucial in the latter respect is
the recent decision of the Spanish Constitutional Court, which has rightly established the partial unconstitutionality of Royal Decree 463/2020, of 14 March, declaring a state of alarm against COVID-19. Because
a fundamental rights suspension cannot be accepted under this figure, a state of emergency should have been
activated, as it requires parliamentary permission prior to the adoption of such measures. |
---|