¿Cárcel para los colusores? Reflexiones sobre la criminalización de las prácticas anticompetitivas en el Perú
On August 29, 2020, in an attempt to address some of the public's claims in the context of the health crisis, the Congress of the Republic of Peru approved Law 31040, a Law amending the Criminal Code and the Consumer Protection Code, with regard to hoarding, speculation and adulteration, w...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Artículo |
Idioma: | Castellano |
Publicado: |
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8073049 |
Fuente: | THEMIS: Revista de Derecho, ISSN 1810-9934, Nº. 78, 2020 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Competencia), pags. 207-217 |
Etiquetas: |
Añadir etiqueta
Sin etiquetas: Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro
|
Sumario: |
On August 29, 2020, in an attempt to address some
of the public's claims in the context of the health
crisis, the Congress of the Republic of Peru approved
Law 31040, a Law amending the Criminal Code
and the Consumer Protection Code, with regard
to hoarding, speculation and adulteration, which
aims to criminalize the execution of anticompetitive
practices. Thus, these practices, until before the
enactment, merited only administrative sanctions
imposed by Indecopi's Committee on the Defense
of Free Competition.
In this paper, the authors present some reflections
on the compatibility of that Act with the Peruvian
legal system. In this way, they substantiate why it
constitutes an obstacle to the suppression of anticompetitive
practices and increases the level of
legal uncertainty for potential offenders. |
---|