Palestina versus Estados Unidos ante la Corte Internacional de Justicia

This article discusses Palestine’s lawsuit against the United States before the International Court of Justice for its alleged violations of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. The lawsuit was brought after the US president’s announcement to move the embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Solano Ramírez, Lucia, Quintana Aranguren, Juan José
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7859849
Source:Díkaion: revista de actualidad jurídica, ISSN 0120-8942, Vol. 29, Nº. 2, 2020, pags. 352-378
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
Summary: This article discusses Palestine’s lawsuit against the United States before the International Court of Justice for its alleged violations of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. The lawsuit was brought after the US president’s announcement to move the embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. The case has critical diplomatic repercussions but raises various legal questions related to Palestine’s access to the Court with or without its capacity as a State, the Court’s jurisdiction, the enforceability of Palestine’s adherence to the Convention and its Optional Protocol, and the admissibility of the lawsuit. The paper discusses whether Palestine could initiate a case before the Court, whether the secretariat of the Court should have accepted the case, and whether the Court has jurisdiction to rule on it. This analysis is based on the provisions in the Court’s bylaws, regulations, and extensive case law regarding procedural matters. Para citar este artículo / To reference this article / Para citar este artigo Lucía Solano y Juan José Quintana, “Palestina versus Estados Unidos ante la Corte Internacional de Justicia”, en Díkaion 29, 2 (2020), xx. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5294/dika.2020.29.2.2