La teoría de John Rawls en la jurisprudencia constitucional
This text tries to expose some of the central ideas of the Theory of Justice of the North American philosopher John Rawls. First, I will examine the general characteristics of the two principles of justice; secondly, I will analyze how these principles are developed in a democratic state in what Raw...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7784871 |
| Source: | Revista Estudios Socio-Jurídicos, ISSN 0124-0579, Vol. 23, Nº. 1, 2021 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Aniversario 30 años de la Constitución Política de 1991) |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| Summary: |
This text tries to expose some of the central ideas of the Theory of Justice of the North American philosopher John Rawls. First, I will examine the general characteristics of the two principles of justice; secondly, I will analyze how these principles are developed in a democratic state in what Rawls calls the “four-stage sequence”. Having exposed the above, I will concentrate on two of those four stages: on the one hand, I will relate
the second of the four stages to the theory of popular constitutionalism (constituent power), a central concept in modern constitutionalism. On the other hand, I will study the last stage of this sequence facing the role of the judge in Colombia, specifically in relation to the constitutional control of law. Finally, I will try to show how the reception of the North American author has been in the jurisprudence of the Colombian Constitutional Court. |
|---|