El sentido interpretativo de la pérdida del bien en la obligación proveniente de delito o falta

This original article brief, gives release preliminary results of a study conducted in the year 2014 on the loss of the good obligation from crime or misdemeanor and the restitution of property governed by Peruvian law, therefore it aims to establish the interpretive meaning of Article 1140 of the C...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Espinoza Coila, Michael
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2020
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7605988
Source:Revista de Dereho: Universidad Nacional del Altiplano de Puno, ISSN 2313-6944, Vol. 5, Vol. 1, 2020 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Revista de Derecho de la Universidad Nacional del Altiplano de Puno), pags. 248-253
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
Summary: This original article brief, gives release preliminary results of a study conducted in the year 2014 on the loss of the good obligation from crime or misdemeanor and the restitution of property governed by Peruvian law, therefore it aims to establish the interpretive meaning of Article 1140 of the Civil Code of Peru established that the debtor (author of the crime or offense) is required to pay the value of a good, arising from the commission of the offense or lack the creditor (third party purchaser in good faith), by the legal impossibility to deliver a well that was returned to its rightful owner. This course does not apply when the debtor (the offender) has been in arrears to creditor (third party purchaser in good faith). To reach this result, he came to the knowledge of contract law and criminal law, which allowed us to contextualize the interpretive problem. The investigation employment legal method (legal dogmatic), techniques of legal interpretation and textual records of literature review.