Juiz constitucional e diálogo jurisdicional multinível: A experiência chilena

This paper starts analyzing the Constitutional Court’s Eichin and Antilef cases on the scope of the competence of the military justice in Chile. In Eichin and Antilef, the Constitu-tional Court applied both the Inter-American Convention on Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights ca...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cavallo, Gonzalo Aguilar
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Ciências Sociais Aplicadas
Direito
Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos
diálogo entre juízes
jurisdição militar
jurisprudência interamericana
novo direito público
Diálogo entre Cortes Constitucionais
Inter-American Court of Human Rights
dialo-gue between judges
military justice
Inter-American case > law
new public law
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7322222
Source:Revista de Investigações Constitucionais, ISSN 2359-5639, Vol. 6, Nº. 1, 2019 (Ejemplar dedicado a: janeiro/abril), pags. 61-89
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
Juiz constitucional e diálogo jurisdicional multinível: A experiência chilena
Summary: This paper starts analyzing the Constitutional Court’s Eichin and Antilef cases on the scope of the competence of the military justice in Chile. In Eichin and Antilef, the Constitu-tional Court applied both the Inter-American Convention on Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights caselaw. The research addresses the question of whether these cases reflect a paradigm shift in public Law and of dialogue between judges. We argue that Eichin and Antilef cases are examples of a process of transition toward a new constitutional paradigm, which is essentially marked by the intensification of the dialogue between judges in human rights

Similar Items