La falacia de la seguridad objetiva y sus consecuencias.
The determination that the main ground for citizens' security perception was not linked (directly and uniquely) with crime had, as a consequence, the definition of two kinds of security: the objective one, empirically demonstrable, truly existing, and the other one, the subjective, volatile und...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7300478 |
| Source: | International e-journal of criminal sciences, ISSN 1988-7949, Nº. 15, 2020 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001370843
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
International e-journal of criminal sciences, ISSN 1988-7949, Nº. 15, 2020
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
Objective security
subjective security perception of security Seguridad objetiva seguridad subjetiva percepción de seguridad |
| spellingShingle |
Objective security
subjective security perception of security Seguridad objetiva seguridad subjetiva percepción de seguridad Guillén Lasierra, Francesc La falacia de la seguridad objetiva y sus consecuencias. |
| description |
The determination that the main ground for citizens' security perception was not linked (directly and uniquely) with crime had, as a consequence, the definition of two kinds of security: the objective one, empirically demonstrable, truly existing, and the other one, the subjective, volatile und unreal, related to population's security perception. The later, although not necessarily based on crime, had to be taken into account because it influenced people's conducts. This article aims to evidence that the so called "objective security" depends on a lot of subjectivities from diverse actors, on which risks are considered acceptable, the ground goods considered to need protection, the circumstances that influence the main actors' decisions making procedures, the rules from assurance companies, resources in police stations, or the time coincidence of incidents that require police attention or response. That's to say: Objective security is also quite subjective. Nevertheless, the fact that security be mainly composed of subjective elements doesn't mean that the sources used to ascertain the traditional objective security (surveys and police statistics) are not relevant any more, or that the origin of insecurity is not important in order to design policies and strategies as response to it.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Guillén Lasierra, Francesc
|
| author_facet |
Guillén Lasierra, Francesc
|
| author_sort |
Guillén Lasierra, Francesc
|
| title |
La falacia de la seguridad objetiva y sus consecuencias.
|
| title_short |
La falacia de la seguridad objetiva y sus consecuencias.
|
| title_full |
La falacia de la seguridad objetiva y sus consecuencias.
|
| title_fullStr |
La falacia de la seguridad objetiva y sus consecuencias.
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
La falacia de la seguridad objetiva y sus consecuencias.
|
| title_sort |
la falacia de la seguridad objetiva y sus consecuencias.
|
| publishDate |
2020
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7300478
|
| _version_ |
1747328763896528896
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00013708432022-10-20La falacia de la seguridad objetiva y sus consecuencias.Guillén Lasierra, FrancescObjective securitysubjective securityperception of securitySeguridad objetivaseguridad subjetivapercepción de seguridadThe determination that the main ground for citizens' security perception was not linked (directly and uniquely) with crime had, as a consequence, the definition of two kinds of security: the objective one, empirically demonstrable, truly existing, and the other one, the subjective, volatile und unreal, related to population's security perception. The later, although not necessarily based on crime, had to be taken into account because it influenced people's conducts. This article aims to evidence that the so called "objective security" depends on a lot of subjectivities from diverse actors, on which risks are considered acceptable, the ground goods considered to need protection, the circumstances that influence the main actors' decisions making procedures, the rules from assurance companies, resources in police stations, or the time coincidence of incidents that require police attention or response. That's to say: Objective security is also quite subjective. Nevertheless, the fact that security be mainly composed of subjective elements doesn't mean that the sources used to ascertain the traditional objective security (surveys and police statistics) are not relevant any more, or that the origin of insecurity is not important in order to design policies and strategies as response to it.La determinación de que la causa fundamental de la percepción de seguridad de la ciudadanía no estaba relacionada ni directa ni únicamente con la delincuencia llevó a conceptualizar dos tipos de seguridad: una, la objetiva, que sería la que era constatable, la que realmente existía; la otra: la subjetiva, más irreal y voluble, que hacia referencia a la percepción de seguridad de la población, que, aunque frecuentemente no tenía un substrato criminal, había que tener en cuenta porque afectaba notablemente la conducta de las personas. Este artículo pretende mostrar que la tan cacareada objetividad del primer tipo de seguridad depende totalmente de voluntades y valores (subjetivos) de diversos operadores, de los riesgos que se consideran tolerables y los que no, de los bienes que se decide proteger, de las circunstancias que condicionan la actuación de los actores del sistema de justicia penal, de las condiciones de las compañías aseguradoras, de la cantidad y horario de las oficinas de recepción de denuncias o de la coincidencia temporal de eventos que requieren la intervención de la policía. Es decir, la seguridad objetiva es muy subjetiva también. De todas maneras, este carácter marcadamente subjetivo de la seguridad no significa que las fuentes que nos informaban de la seguridad objetiva (encuestas y estadística policial) no sigan teniendo importancia para llevar a cabo diagnósticos de seguridad ni que conocer el origen de la inseguridad (más o menos objetivable) es fundamental para diseñar políticas y estrategias para combatirlas.2020text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7300478(Revista) ISSN 1988-7949International e-journal of criminal sciences, ISSN 1988-7949, Nº. 15, 2020spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|