El arbitraje internacional en la obra de Francisco Suárez: A propósito de una antigua polémica
This article focuses on the old controversy between Viñas, Hellín and Pereña regarding the right to war doctrine and the international arbitration halfway the XX century. Viñas and Pereña have a subjective and voluntarist interpretation which attends to Suárez’s probabilism. Differently, Hellín beli...
Gorde:
| Egile nagusia: | |
|---|---|
| Formatua: | Artikulua |
| Hizkuntza: | Gaztelania |
| Argitaratua: |
2018
|
| Gaiak: | |
| Sarrera elektronikoa: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7175035 |
| Baliabidea: | Revista Jurídica Digital UANDES, ISSN 0719-7942, Vol. 2, Nº. 1, 2018 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Número especial sobre Francisco Suárez (1548-1617)), pags. 79-91 |
| Etiketak: |
Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe: Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen
|
| Laburpena: |
This article focuses on the old controversy between Viñas, Hellín and Pereña regarding the right to war doctrine and the international arbitration halfway the XX century. Viñas and Pereña have a subjective and voluntarist interpretation which attends to Suárez’s probabilism. Differently, Hellín believes that Suárez only gathers the scholastic doctrines of those times, similarly to the Dominicans. The controversy goes on still nowadays since Suárez’s tone can be interpreted as absolutist or democratic yet. At the end of the article, a more historically centered hermeneutic is proposed, which differs from our contemporary categories. |
|---|