La prohibición de la violencia simbólica y mediática en la Argentina: ¿superación de la dicotomía público/privada?
Historically, the classic distinction between the public sphere - regulated by the State – and the private sphere - out of its scope – has justified and naturalized state inaction in cases of violence against women. This failure has been overcome both by international and national regulations, w...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7041349 |
Source: | Revista Electrónica del Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales Ambrosio Lucas Gioja, ISSN 1851-3069, Nº. 20, 2018, pags. 156-185 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
Summary: |
Historically, the classic distinction between the public sphere -
regulated by the State – and the private sphere - out of its scope – has
justified and naturalized state inaction in cases of violence against women.
This failure has been overcome both by international and national
regulations, which establish the State's responsibility for cases of violence
against women even when they occur in the private sphere. Consequently,
Argentina has incorporated femicide as a crime of public action. It has also
recognized symbolic violence as a form of violence that crosses both areas.
However, the mediatic treatment of femicides denotes contradictions
regarding the regulation of symbolic violence based on the public /
private dichotomy. This article explores the scope of the conceptualization
of symbolic violence from a theoretical, legal and practical perspective –,
and its implication around said dichotomy. It incorporates a qualitative
analysis of the femicide news of the three newspapers with the highest
national circulation (Página12, Clarín and La Nación) since June 3, 2015,
the date of the first mass mobilization organized by the movement “Not
one less”, until February 2017 inclusive. |
---|