La Anulación del Laudo por su motivación en el Perú – cómo hacer frente a una Vía Distorsionada

Judicial review of the awards in Peru is in practice problematic and incomprehensible. Even though the law expressly forbids the judicial analysis of the reasoning of the award, in reality more than the half of proceedings for setting aside an award are based on objections to its reasoning. In view...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rivas Caso, Gino
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Arbitraje
corrupción
Debido Proceso
recurso de anulación
Ética profesional
Arbitration
Corruption
Due Process
Annulment Remedy
Professional Ethics
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6550297
Source:THEMIS: Revista de Derecho, ISSN 1810-9934, Nº. 72, 2017 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Derecho Mercantil), pags. 225-234
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
La Anulación del Laudo por su motivación en el Perú – cómo hacer frente a una Vía Distorsionada
Summary: Judicial review of the awards in Peru is in practice problematic and incomprehensible. Even though the law expressly forbids the judicial analysis of the reasoning of the award, in reality more than the half of proceedings for setting aside an award are based on objections to its reasoning. In view of this situation, it is essential to understand which are the “defects” in the reasoning that renders void the award, in order to not commit them. This paper seeks to propose guidelines that allows arbitrators to avoid the annulment of the award due to its reasoning.

Similar Items