¿Progresión o regresión constitucional de la justicia penal española? Irrupción del populismo judicial y del derecho penal de autor
The article analyzes the configuration given by the Spanish Constitution (1978) to the justice administration and the specialties of the criminal jurisdiction, pointing the unsatisfactory aspects of the constitutional model. Following, the author highlights the real evolution of both the general and...
Gorde:
| Egile nagusia: | |
|---|---|
| Formatua: | Artikulua |
| Hizkuntza: | Gaztelania |
| Argitaratua: |
2019
|
| Gaiak: | |
| Sarrera elektronikoa: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6933164 |
| Baliabidea: | Teoría y realidad constitucional, ISSN 1139-5583, Nº 43, 2019, pags. 193-227 |
| Etiketak: |
Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe: Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen
|
| Laburpena: |
The article analyzes the configuration given by the Spanish Constitution (1978) to the justice administration and the specialties of the criminal jurisdiction, pointing the unsatisfactory aspects of the constitutional model. Following, the author highlights the real evolution of both the general and the criminal justice administration activity since the Constitution was enacted, reality which has become unrespectful with the Constitution´s principles and regulations. Finally, the document propose for both general and criminal justice administration “de lege data et ferenda” solutions to drive the Spanish judicial administration to an adaptation to current time needs, evolving from the results of the first revolution of justice administration (Gloriosa in 1868) to a second and highly needed revolution. |
|---|