¿Progresión o regresión constitucional de la justicia penal española? Irrupción del populismo judicial y del derecho penal de autor

The article analyzes the configuration given by the Spanish Constitution (1978) to the justice administration and the specialties of the criminal jurisdiction, pointing the unsatisfactory aspects of the constitutional model. Following, the author highlights the real evolution of both the general and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rodríguez Ramos, Luis
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6933164
Source:Teoría y realidad constitucional, ISSN 1139-5583, Nº 43, 2019, pags. 193-227
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
Summary: The article analyzes the configuration given by the Spanish Constitution (1978) to the justice administration and the specialties of the criminal jurisdiction, pointing the unsatisfactory aspects of the constitutional model. Following, the author highlights the real evolution of both the general and the criminal justice administration activity since the Constitution was enacted, reality which has become unrespectful with the Constitution´s principles and regulations. Finally, the document propose for both general and criminal justice administration “de lege data et ferenda” solutions to drive the Spanish judicial administration to an adaptation to current time needs, evolving from the results of the first revolution of justice administration (Gloriosa in 1868) to a second and highly needed revolution.