Discricionariedade: juízo de empate
This study is aimed at one of the most problematic issues not only of Administrative Law, but of Law as a whole, which is the conceptualization and operability of the discretionary judgment. It seeks to explain how discretion, in spite of the centrality of its importance, is a misunderstood notion a...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Portuguese |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6675901 |
Source: | Seqüência: estudos jurídicos e políticos, ISSN 2177-7055, Vol. 39, Nº. 79, 2018, pags. 45-62 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001297349
|
---|---|
record_format |
dialnet
|
spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00012973492018-11-29Discricionariedade: juízo de empateOliveira, Fábio SouzaDiscretionaryAdministrative LawLinkingDiscricionariedadeDireito AdministrativoVinculaçãoThis study is aimed at one of the most problematic issues not only of Administrative Law, but of Law as a whole, which is the conceptualization and operability of the discretionary judgment. It seeks to explain how discretion, in spite of the centrality of its importance, is a misunderstood notion and that presents different and divergent conceptions. The examination of the objectin question reveals theoretical confusions and contradictions, which therefore requires an effort for the sake of clarification and terminological accuracy and definition. This article takes as investigative field, above all, the Brazilian administrative doctrine.Este estudo está voltado para um dos temas mais problemáticos não apenas do Di-reito Administrativo, mas do Direito em outros âmbitos, que é a conceituação e a operacionali-dade do juízo discricionário. Pretende-se explicitar como a discricionariedade, em que pese acentralidade da sua importância, é uma noção mal compreendida e que apresenta diferentes edivergentes concepções. O exame detido do objeto em questão revela confusões e contradiçõesteóricas, o que, portanto, demanda um esforço para o bem do esclarecimento e da exatidãoterminológica e de definição. Este artigo toma como campo investigativo, sobretudo, a doutri-na administrativa brasileira.2018text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6675901(Revista) ISSN 2177-7055Seqüência: estudos jurídicos e políticos, ISSN 2177-7055, Vol. 39, Nº. 79, 2018, pags. 45-62porLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
institution |
Dialnet
|
collection |
Dialnet AR
|
source |
Seqüência: estudos jurídicos e políticos, ISSN 2177-7055, Vol. 39, Nº. 79, 2018, pags. 45-62
|
language |
Portuguese
|
topic |
Discretionary
Administrative Law Linking Discricionariedade Direito Administrativo Vinculação |
spellingShingle |
Discretionary
Administrative Law Linking Discricionariedade Direito Administrativo Vinculação Oliveira, Fábio Souza Discricionariedade: juízo de empate |
description |
This study is aimed at one of the most problematic issues not only of Administrative Law, but of Law as a whole, which is the conceptualization and operability of the discretionary judgment. It seeks to explain how discretion, in spite of the centrality of its importance, is a misunderstood notion and that presents different and divergent conceptions. The examination of the objectin question reveals theoretical confusions and contradictions, which therefore requires an effort for the sake of clarification and terminological accuracy and definition. This article takes as investigative field, above all, the Brazilian administrative doctrine.
|
format |
Article
|
author |
Oliveira, Fábio Souza
|
author_facet |
Oliveira, Fábio Souza
|
author_sort |
Oliveira, Fábio Souza
|
title |
Discricionariedade: juízo de empate
|
title_short |
Discricionariedade: juízo de empate
|
title_full |
Discricionariedade: juízo de empate
|
title_fullStr |
Discricionariedade: juízo de empate
|
title_full_unstemmed |
Discricionariedade: juízo de empate
|
title_sort |
discricionariedade: juízo de empate
|
publishDate |
2018
|
url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6675901
|
_version_ |
1709748363354701824
|