Entre la culpa presunta y la responsabilidad objetiva

The Justice Supreme Court has dealt with the responsibility imputation for automotive collision study over the time. During more than ten decades, it has been passed from blame alleged to the liability regime and vice versa. This article is intended to demonstrate that judges and magistrates in Colo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cadena Casas, Andrés Felipe
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2017
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6610321
Source:Revista Via Iuris, ISSN 1909-5759, Nº. 22, 2017, pags. 45-59
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
Summary: The Justice Supreme Court has dealt with the responsibility imputation for automotive collision study over the time. During more than ten decades, it has been passed from blame alleged to the liability regime and vice versa. This article is intended to demonstrate that judges and magistrates in Colombia have mistakenly tried to introduce an objective system that has qualified the jurisprudence in a liability regime that has never been referred to by the Colombian civil code. It is concluded that the responsibility for automotive collision in Colombia has been studied and applied from the guilt.