Venezuela en la frontera de la desobediencia inconclusa
The objective of this article is to analyze the epistemic, ontological and axiological construction of the political process of the Bolivarian Revolution in Venezuela, as a process of social transformation declared in transition to socialism, permeated by constructs of the global hegemonic order, wh...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6521925 |
| Source: | SAPIENTIAE, ISSN 2183-5063, Vol. 4, Nº. 1, 2018 (Ejemplar dedicado a: JULHO-DEZEMBRO 2018), pags. 127-148 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001278487
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
SAPIENTIAE, ISSN 2183-5063, Vol. 4, Nº. 1, 2018 (Ejemplar dedicado a: JULHO-DEZEMBRO 2018), pags. 127-148
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
Bolivarian Revolution of Venezuela
hegemony epistemology of the South Socialism of the XXI Century modernity Revolución Bolivariana de Venezuela hegemonía epistemología del Sur Socialismo del Siglo XXI modernidad Revolução Bolivariana da Venezuela Hegemonia Epistemologia do Sul Socialismo do Século XXI Modernidade |
| spellingShingle |
Bolivarian Revolution of Venezuela
hegemony epistemology of the South Socialism of the XXI Century modernity Revolución Bolivariana de Venezuela hegemonía epistemología del Sur Socialismo del Siglo XXI modernidad Revolução Bolivariana da Venezuela Hegemonia Epistemologia do Sul Socialismo do Século XXI Modernidade Acuña Ortigoza, Marianela Ávila Ramírez, Pablo Mendoza, Alexandra Venezuela en la frontera de la desobediencia inconclusa |
| description |
The objective of this article is to analyze the epistemic, ontological and axiological construction of the political process of the Bolivarian Revolution in Venezuela, as a process of social transformation declared in transition to socialism, permeated by constructs of the global hegemonic order, which is torn between the radical rupture and survival reformism. The main authors are Boaventura de Sousa and Walter Mignolo, in the conceptual framework of Southern Epistemology, epistemic disobedience and the decolonization of knowledge. An analytical, documentary methodology was used, based on the comparative analysis of bibliographic, legal and electronic documents, the resource of the hermeneusis allowed concluding that, in Venezuela, the epistemological rupture in doing is diminished by the incorporation into the discursive logic of the sociopolitical process, of concepts typical of the cultural hegemony of Western modernity. The viability of the Bolivarian Revolution faces permanent threats to its sustainability, no identity has been achieved between the discursive enunciation and the reality that is transformed. The debate between the radical rupture and the reformism of survival, places the Bolivarian Revolution on the frontier of reformism, without finding a substantive postcapitalist definition.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Acuña Ortigoza, Marianela
Ávila Ramírez, Pablo Mendoza, Alexandra |
| author_facet |
Acuña Ortigoza, Marianela
Ávila Ramírez, Pablo Mendoza, Alexandra |
| author_sort |
Acuña Ortigoza, Marianela
|
| title |
Venezuela en la frontera de la desobediencia inconclusa
|
| title_short |
Venezuela en la frontera de la desobediencia inconclusa
|
| title_full |
Venezuela en la frontera de la desobediencia inconclusa
|
| title_fullStr |
Venezuela en la frontera de la desobediencia inconclusa
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Venezuela en la frontera de la desobediencia inconclusa
|
| title_sort |
venezuela en la frontera de la desobediencia inconclusa
|
| publishDate |
2018
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6521925
|
| _version_ |
1727401141883371520
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00012784872022-03-13Venezuela en la frontera de la desobediencia inconclusaAcuña Ortigoza, MarianelaÁvila Ramírez, PabloMendoza, AlexandraBolivarian Revolution of Venezuelahegemonyepistemology of the SouthSocialism of the XXI CenturymodernityRevolución Bolivariana de Venezuelahegemoníaepistemología del SurSocialismo del Siglo XXImodernidadRevolução Bolivariana da VenezuelaHegemoniaEpistemologia do SulSocialismo do Século XXIModernidadeThe objective of this article is to analyze the epistemic, ontological and axiological construction of the political process of the Bolivarian Revolution in Venezuela, as a process of social transformation declared in transition to socialism, permeated by constructs of the global hegemonic order, which is torn between the radical rupture and survival reformism. The main authors are Boaventura de Sousa and Walter Mignolo, in the conceptual framework of Southern Epistemology, epistemic disobedience and the decolonization of knowledge. An analytical, documentary methodology was used, based on the comparative analysis of bibliographic, legal and electronic documents, the resource of the hermeneusis allowed concluding that, in Venezuela, the epistemological rupture in doing is diminished by the incorporation into the discursive logic of the sociopolitical process, of concepts typical of the cultural hegemony of Western modernity. The viability of the Bolivarian Revolution faces permanent threats to its sustainability, no identity has been achieved between the discursive enunciation and the reality that is transformed. The debate between the radical rupture and the reformism of survival, places the Bolivarian Revolution on the frontier of reformism, without finding a substantive postcapitalist definition.O objectivo deste artigo é analisar a epistemológica, construção ontológica e a axiológica do processo político da Revolução Bolivariana na Venezuela, como um processo de transformação social, declarado na transição para o socialismo, permeada por construções de ordem hegemónica global, que está dividido entre quebra de reformismo radical e de sobrevivência. Eles são usados como principais autores Boaventura de Sousa e Walter Mignolo, no âmbito da epistemologia do Sul, a desobediência epistémica e descolonização do conhecimento. analítica, a metodologia documental, com base na análise comparativa dos documentos bibliográficos, legais e electrónicos, o uso de hermeneusis permitiu concluir que na Venezuela foi utilizada na ruptura epistemológica e diminuída pela incorporação da lógica discursiva do processo sociopolítico , de conceitos típicos da hegemonia cultural da modernidade ocidental. A viabilidade da Revolução Bolivariana enfrenta ameaças permanentes à sua sustentabilidade, nenhuma identidade foi alcançada entre a enunciação discursiva e a realidade que se transforma. O debate entre a ruptura radical e sobrevivência reformismo coloca a Revolução Bolivariana na fronteira do reformismo, sem encontrar uma post capitales definição substantiva.El objetivo de este artículo, es analizar la construcción epistémica, ontológica y axiológica del proceso político de la Revolución Bolivariana en Venezuela, como proceso de transformación social declarado en transición al socialismo, permeado por constructos del orden hegemónico global, que se debate entre la ruptura radical y el reformismo de supervivencia. Se utilizan como principales autores a Boaventura de Sousa yWalter Mignolo, en el marco conceptual de la Epistemología del Sur, la desobediencia epistémica y la descolonización del saber. Se utilizó una metodología analítica, documental, basada en el análisis comparativo de documentos bibliográficos,legales y electrónicos, el recurso de la hermeneusis permitió concluir que, en Venezuela la ruptura epistemológica en el hacer queda disminuida por la incorporación a la lógica discursiva del proceso sociopolítico, de conceptos propios de la hegemonía cultural de la modernidad occidental. La viabilidad de la Revolución Bolivariana enfrenta amenazas permanentes a su sostenibilidad, no se ha logrado identidad entre la enunciación discursiva y la realidad que se transforma.El debate entre la ruptura radical y el reformismo de supervivencia, sitúa a la Revolución Bolivariana en la frontera del reformismo, sin encontrar una definición sustantiva postcapitalista.2018text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6521925(Revista) ISSN 2184-061X(Revista) ISSN 2183-5063SAPIENTIAE, ISSN 2183-5063, Vol. 4, Nº. 1, 2018 (Ejemplar dedicado a: JULHO-DEZEMBRO 2018), pags. 127-148spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|