Venezuela en la frontera de la desobediencia inconclusa

The objective of this article is to analyze the epistemic, ontological and axiological construction of the political process of the Bolivarian Revolution in Venezuela, as a process of social transformation declared in transition to socialism, permeated by constructs of the global hegemonic order, wh...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Acuña Ortigoza, Marianela, Ávila Ramírez, Pablo, Mendoza, Alexandra
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Bolivarian Revolution of Venezuela
hegemony
epistemology of the South
Socialism of the XXI Century
modernity
Revolución Bolivariana de Venezuela
hegemonía
epistemología del Sur
Socialismo del Siglo XXI
modernidad
Revolução Bolivariana da Venezuela
Hegemonia
Epistemologia do Sul
Socialismo do Século XXI
Modernidade
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6521925
Source:SAPIENTIAE, ISSN 2183-5063, Vol. 4, Nº. 1, 2018 (Ejemplar dedicado a: JULHO-DEZEMBRO 2018), pags. 127-148
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
Venezuela en la frontera de la desobediencia inconclusa
Summary: The objective of this article is to analyze the epistemic, ontological and axiological construction of the political process of the Bolivarian Revolution in Venezuela, as a process of social transformation declared in transition to socialism, permeated by constructs of the global hegemonic order, which is torn between the radical rupture and survival reformism. The main authors are Boaventura de Sousa and Walter Mignolo, in the conceptual framework of Southern Epistemology, epistemic disobedience and the decolonization of knowledge. An analytical, documentary methodology was used, based on the comparative analysis of bibliographic, legal and electronic documents, the resource of the hermeneusis allowed concluding that, in Venezuela, the epistemological rupture in doing is diminished by the incorporation into the discursive logic of the sociopolitical process, of concepts typical of the cultural hegemony of Western modernity. The viability of the Bolivarian Revolution faces permanent threats to its sustainability, no identity has been achieved between the discursive enunciation and the reality that is transformed. The debate between the radical rupture and the reformism of survival, places the Bolivarian Revolution on the frontier of reformism, without finding a substantive postcapitalist definition.

Similar Items