Venezuela en la frontera de la desobediencia inconclusa
The objective of this article is to analyze the epistemic, ontological and axiological construction of the political process of the Bolivarian Revolution in Venezuela, as a process of social transformation declared in transition to socialism, permeated by constructs of the global hegemonic order, wh...
Gorde:
| Egile Nagusiak: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formatua: | Artikulua |
| Hizkuntza: | Gaztelania |
| Argitaratua: |
2018
|
| Gaiak: | |
| Sarrera elektronikoa: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6521925 |
| Baliabidea: | SAPIENTIAE, ISSN 2183-5063, Vol. 4, Nº. 1, 2018 (Ejemplar dedicado a: JULHO-DEZEMBRO 2018), pags. 127-148 |
| Etiketak: |
Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe: Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen
|
| Laburpena: |
The objective of this article is to analyze the epistemic, ontological and axiological construction of the political process of the Bolivarian Revolution in Venezuela, as a process of social transformation declared in transition to socialism, permeated by constructs of the global hegemonic order, which is torn between the radical rupture and survival reformism. The main authors are Boaventura de Sousa and Walter Mignolo, in the conceptual framework of Southern Epistemology, epistemic disobedience and the decolonization of knowledge. An analytical, documentary methodology was used, based on the comparative analysis of bibliographic, legal and electronic documents, the resource of the hermeneusis allowed concluding that, in Venezuela, the epistemological rupture in doing is diminished by the incorporation into the discursive logic of the sociopolitical process, of concepts typical of the cultural hegemony of Western modernity. The viability of the Bolivarian Revolution faces permanent threats to its sustainability, no identity has been achieved between the discursive enunciation and the reality that is transformed. The debate between the radical rupture and the reformism of survival, places the Bolivarian Revolution on the frontier of reformism, without finding a substantive postcapitalist definition. |
|---|