La Sentencia Rol N.° 9.031-2013 de la Corte Suprema de Chile. ¿Una aplicación del control de convencionalidad en el análisis de la extradición pasiva por el delito de transporte de estupefacientes?

Abstract This work offers in an analytical manner the meanings attributable to the “conventionality control” from the study of the jurisprudence emanating from the Inter-American Court. Likewise, it attempts to establish whether or not in passive extradition cases the Chilean Supreme Court applies t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Henríquez Viñas, Miriam Lorena
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Extradición
procedimiento en caso de extradición
Derecho internacional
Derecho de los derechos humanos
Derecho de los tratados
Extradition
procedure in the event of extradition
International Law
Human Rights Law
the Law of Treaties
Extradição
procedimento em caso do extradição
Direito Internacional
Direito dos direitos humanos
Direito dos tratados
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6226258
Source:Criminalidad, ISSN 1794-3108, Vol. 59, Nº. 2, 2017, pags. 139-149
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
La Sentencia Rol N.° 9.031-2013 de la Corte Suprema de Chile. ¿Una aplicación del control de convencionalidad en el análisis de la extradición pasiva por el delito de transporte de estupefacientes?
Summary: Abstract This work offers in an analytical manner the meanings attributable to the “conventionality control” from the study of the jurisprudence emanating from the Inter-American Court. Likewise, it attempts to establish whether or not in passive extradition cases the Chilean Supreme Court applies this “conventionality control”, while examining what are the meaning and scope that the highest national court attributes to the above-mentioned exam in contrast with the senses suggested in a praetorian manner by the Inter-American Court. The above, in the context of the only judgment where the Supreme Court of Chile affirms having exercised this conventionality control, i.e. in the resolution of the passive extradition of a Bolivian citizen charged with taking part as an author in the crime of narcotics trafficking, Rol N.° 9.031-2013. The conclusión reached is that it was not exercised properly by the highest court which, in addition, did not follow the meaning and effects assigned by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in its did not exercise in a proper manner that control in its prevailing jurisprudence that fundamentally conceives it as a normative control between internal rules and the inter-American corpus iuris, all the foregoing within the framework of an analysis of cases made according to the critical method.

Similar Items