A refutação de Dworkin ao ceticismo quanto às pretensões juridicamente tuteladas
This article is a result of scientific research conducted about a theory belonging to the field of Philosophy of Law entitled Legal Pragmatism, specifically as to its main characteristics about the judicial acting from the perspective of the indoctrinator and US judge Richard Posner as well as the c...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| Published: |
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6071222 |
| Source: | Revista Electrónica Direito e Sociedade - REDES, ISSN 2318-8081, Vol. 5, Nº. 1, 2017132 pags. |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001212220
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00012122202017-08-18A refutação de Dworkin ao ceticismo quanto às pretensões juridicamente tuteladasVerbicaro, Loiane da Ponte Souza PradoRodrigues, Isabelle de AssunçãoJudicial ActingLegal PragmatismRichard PosnerRonald DworkinLaw as IntegrityAtuação JudicialPragmatismo JurídicoRichard PosnerDireito como IntegridadeRonald DworkinThis article is a result of scientific research conducted about a theory belonging to the field of Philosophy of Law entitled Legal Pragmatism, specifically as to its main characteristics about the judicial acting from the perspective of the indoctrinator and US judge Richard Posner as well as the criticism made by the also philosopher of law Ronald Dworkin on some aspects of the thought of Posner, especially the aspect of skepticism as to pretensions juridically tutored. In addition, it presents the solution developed by Dworkin for what he believes are inconsistencies presents in the Legal Pragmatism of Posner, that would be the law as integrity. Analyzes of THE theoretical way the thought of these two authors, both appropriating some of his major works which focus on the judicial acting. Considers, lastly, that Dworkin does not ignore the Legal Pragmatism as a whole, having succeeded in extracting the best aspects of this theory in order to reach a solution that, in his view, would be more consistent and complete to legal practice.O presente artigo tem como objetivo analisar o pragmatismo jurídico, especificamente as suas principais características acerca da atuação judicial, sob a ótica do autor e juiz norte-americano Richard Posner, bem como as críticas traçadas por Ronald Dworkin sobre alguns aspectos do pensamento de Posner, especialmente o ceticismo quanto às pretensões juridicamente tuteladas. Por intermédio de pesquisa teórica, analisa o pensamento destes dois autores e apresenta a solução elaborada por Dworkin, relativa ao direito como integridade, para as inconsistências do pragmatismo jurídico de Posner. Considera ao fim, que Dworkin não rejeita o pragmatismo jurídico como um todo. Na verdade, o direito como integridade extrai os melhores aspectos do pragmatismo a fim de chegar a uma solução mais coerente e completa para a prática jurídica. 2017text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6071222(Revista) ISSN 2318-8081Revista Electrónica Direito e Sociedade - REDES, ISSN 2318-8081, Vol. 5, Nº. 1, 2017132 pags. porLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista Electrónica Direito e Sociedade - REDES, ISSN 2318-8081, Vol. 5, Nº. 1, 2017132 pags.
|
| language |
Portuguese
|
| topic |
Judicial Acting
Legal Pragmatism Richard Posner Ronald Dworkin Law as Integrity Atuação Judicial Pragmatismo Jurídico Richard Posner Direito como Integridade Ronald Dworkin |
| spellingShingle |
Judicial Acting
Legal Pragmatism Richard Posner Ronald Dworkin Law as Integrity Atuação Judicial Pragmatismo Jurídico Richard Posner Direito como Integridade Ronald Dworkin Verbicaro, Loiane da Ponte Souza Prado Rodrigues, Isabelle de Assunção A refutação de Dworkin ao ceticismo quanto às pretensões juridicamente tuteladas |
| description |
This article is a result of scientific research conducted about a theory belonging to the field of Philosophy of Law entitled Legal Pragmatism, specifically as to its main characteristics about the judicial acting from the perspective of the indoctrinator and US judge Richard Posner as well as the criticism made by the also philosopher of law Ronald Dworkin on some aspects of the thought of Posner, especially the aspect of skepticism as to pretensions juridically tutored. In addition, it presents the solution developed by Dworkin for what he believes are inconsistencies presents in the Legal Pragmatism of Posner, that would be the law as integrity. Analyzes of THE theoretical way the thought of these two authors, both appropriating some of his major works which focus on the judicial acting. Considers, lastly, that Dworkin does not ignore the Legal Pragmatism as a whole, having succeeded in extracting the best aspects of this theory in order to reach a solution that, in his view, would be more consistent and complete to legal practice.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Verbicaro, Loiane da Ponte Souza Prado
Rodrigues, Isabelle de Assunção |
| author_facet |
Verbicaro, Loiane da Ponte Souza Prado
Rodrigues, Isabelle de Assunção |
| author_sort |
Verbicaro, Loiane da Ponte Souza Prado
|
| title |
A refutação de Dworkin ao ceticismo quanto às pretensões juridicamente tuteladas
|
| title_short |
A refutação de Dworkin ao ceticismo quanto às pretensões juridicamente tuteladas
|
| title_full |
A refutação de Dworkin ao ceticismo quanto às pretensões juridicamente tuteladas
|
| title_fullStr |
A refutação de Dworkin ao ceticismo quanto às pretensões juridicamente tuteladas
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
A refutação de Dworkin ao ceticismo quanto às pretensões juridicamente tuteladas
|
| title_sort |
refutação de dworkin ao ceticismo quanto às pretensões juridicamente tuteladas
|
| publishDate |
2017
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6071222
|
| _version_ |
1709746168643190784
|