Los jueces constitucionales, la política y la deferencia judicial
When the constitutional judge imposes a certain ideology through their sentences, to the detriment of other doctrines that are legitimately beaten in the democratic game, not only ignores the essential differences between politics and law, but also damages the powers of Parliament and, ultimately, t...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2013
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5638996 |
| Source: | Revista Derecho Público Iberoamericano, ISSN 0719-2959, Nº. 2, 2013, pags. 67-101 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001027170
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00010271702016-09-21Los jueces constitucionales, la política y la deferencia judicialPoyanco Bugueño, Rodrigo Andrésactivismo judicialdeferencia judicialjuez constitucionalparlamentopolíticaderechojudicial activismjudicial deferenceconstitutional justiceparliament-politicslawWhen the constitutional judge imposes a certain ideology through their sentences, to the detriment of other doctrines that are legitimately beaten in the democratic game, not only ignores the essential differences between politics and law, but also damages the powers of Parliament and, ultimately, the political autonomy of the society. In response, the doctrine of judicial deference reminds us the limitations of constitutional doctrines as tools for resolving political problems given the importance of preserving that autonomyCuando el juez constitucional impone mediante sus sentencias una determinada ideología, en perjuicio de las demás que se baten legítimamente en el juego democrático, no sólo ignora las diferencias esenciales entre Política y Derecho, sino que compromete las competencias del Parlamento y, en definitiva, la autonomía política de la sociedad. Frente a ello, la doctrina de la deferencia judicial nos recuerda las limitaciones de la jurisprudencia y doctrina constitucionales como herramientas de solución frente a los problemas políticos y la importancia de preservar la referida autonomía2013text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5638996(Revista) ISSN 0719-2959Revista Derecho Público Iberoamericano, ISSN 0719-2959, Nº. 2, 2013, pags. 67-101spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista Derecho Público Iberoamericano, ISSN 0719-2959, Nº. 2, 2013, pags. 67-101
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
activismo judicial
deferencia judicial juez constitucional parlamento política derecho judicial activism judicial deference constitutional justice parliament-politics law |
| spellingShingle |
activismo judicial
deferencia judicial juez constitucional parlamento política derecho judicial activism judicial deference constitutional justice parliament-politics law Poyanco Bugueño, Rodrigo Andrés Los jueces constitucionales, la política y la deferencia judicial |
| description |
When the constitutional judge imposes a certain ideology through their sentences, to the detriment of other doctrines that are legitimately beaten in the democratic game, not only ignores the essential differences between politics and law, but also damages the powers of Parliament and, ultimately, the political autonomy of the society. In response, the doctrine of judicial deference reminds us the limitations of constitutional doctrines as tools for resolving political problems given the importance of preserving that autonomy
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Poyanco Bugueño, Rodrigo Andrés
|
| author_facet |
Poyanco Bugueño, Rodrigo Andrés
|
| author_sort |
Poyanco Bugueño, Rodrigo Andrés
|
| title |
Los jueces constitucionales, la política y la deferencia judicial
|
| title_short |
Los jueces constitucionales, la política y la deferencia judicial
|
| title_full |
Los jueces constitucionales, la política y la deferencia judicial
|
| title_fullStr |
Los jueces constitucionales, la política y la deferencia judicial
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Los jueces constitucionales, la política y la deferencia judicial
|
| title_sort |
los jueces constitucionales, la política y la deferencia judicial
|
| publishDate |
2013
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5638996
|
| _version_ |
1709744562032869376
|