Los jueces constitucionales, la política y la deferencia judicial
When the constitutional judge imposes a certain ideology through their sentences, to the detriment of other doctrines that are legitimately beaten in the democratic game, not only ignores the essential differences between politics and law, but also damages the powers of Parliament and, ultimately, t...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2013
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5638996 |
| Source: | Revista Derecho Público Iberoamericano, ISSN 0719-2959, Nº. 2, 2013, pags. 67-101 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| Summary: |
When the constitutional judge imposes a certain ideology through their sentences, to the detriment of other doctrines that are legitimately beaten in the democratic game, not only ignores the essential differences between politics and law, but also damages the powers of Parliament and, ultimately, the political autonomy of the society. In response, the doctrine of judicial deference reminds us the limitations of constitutional doctrines as tools for resolving political problems given the importance of preserving that autonomy |
|---|