Elementos doctrinales para el estudio de la argumentación como eje del control judicial

This article evaluates several proposals about the argumentation as a necessary requirement in any exercise of judicial review. The proposals are analysed through many doctrinal approaches. For instance, the argumentative democracy; the interpretation and the justification of the decisions; the bala...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vargas Chaves, Iván
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidad Militar Nueva Granada 2013
Subjects:
Argumentación
control judicial
democracia argumentativa
interpretación
ponderación
principios
Argumentation
Argumentative Democracy
Balancing
Judicial Review
Principles
Interpretation
Argumento
controle judicial
argumentativos democracia princípios de ponderação de renderização
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4723652
Source:Revista Prolegómenos. Derechos y Valores de la Facultad de Derecho, ISSN 0121-182X, Vol. 26, Nº. 32, 2013, pags. 235-246
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
Elementos doctrinales para el estudio de la argumentación como eje del control judicial
Summary: This article evaluates several proposals about the argumentation as a necessary requirement in any exercise of judicial review. The proposals are analysed through many doctrinal approaches. For instance, the argumentative democracy; the interpretation and the justification of the decisions; the balancing and the principles. Our intention in this study is neither to analyze some problems and its solutions; rather, it is to present the state of the art in several theories about the role of argumentation in the context of judicial review.

Similar Items