O Julgamento da ADPF n. 54: uma reflexão à luz de Ronald Dworkin
The Allegation of Unconstitutionality number 54 was filed in the Brazilian Supreme Court by the National Confederation of Health Workers, and the Supreme Court, by eight votes to two, upheld the application, declaring the unconstitutionality of the interpretation that the interruption of pregnancy o...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Artículo |
Idioma: | Portugués |
Publicado: |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4204910 |
Fuente: | Seqüência: estudos jurídicos e políticos, ISSN 2177-7055, Vol. 33, Nº. 65, 2012, pags. 155-188 |
Etiquetas: |
Añadir etiqueta
Sin etiquetas: Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro
|
id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0000548642
|
---|---|
record_format |
dialnet
|
spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00005486422019-02-19O Julgamento da ADPF n. 54: uma reflexão à luz de Ronald DworkinBunchaft, Maria EugeniaAnencefaliaSTFDworkinAnencephalyBrazilian Supreme CourtDworkinThe Allegation of Unconstitutionality number 54 was filed in the Brazilian Supreme Court by the National Confederation of Health Workers, and the Supreme Court, by eight votes to two, upheld the application, declaring the unconstitutionality of the interpretation that the interruption of pregnancy of anencephalic fetus would be typified in the Criminal Code. Advocating a moral reading of the law, Dworkin argues that the interpretation of substantive principles should consider not only the Constitution as a whole, but also the history, traditions and constitutional practices. Therefore, we intend to articulate the theme of the Allegation of Unconstitutionality number 54 with the Dworkin�s substantialist perspective, whose proposal for a moral reading can be an important theoretical framework for understanding forms of judicialization aimed at protecting the rights of women with pregnancy of an anencephalic fetus. We intend to demonstrate that, in the judgment of the Allegation of Unconstitutionality number 54, the Brazilian Supreme Court was able to consistently justify the concepts that comprise the field of value, articulating them in a way that one direction complements the other, therefore eliminating the conflictA Arguição de Descumprimento de Preceito Fundamental n. 54 foi ajuizada pela Confederação Nacional dos Trabalhadores na Saúde no STF que, por oito votos a dois, julgou procedente o pedido, declarando a inconstitucionalidade da interpretação segundo a qual a interrupção da gravidez de feto anencéfalo seria tipificada no Código Penal. Defendendo uma leitura moral do ordenamento jurídico, Dworkin sustenta que a interpretação de princípios substantivos deve considerar, não apenas a Constituição como um todo, mas também a história, as tradições e as práticas constitucionais. Nesse sentido, pretende-se articular a temática da ADPF n. 54 à perspectiva substancialista delineada por Dworkin, cuja proposta de leitura moral pode ser um referencial teórico importante para compreender formas de judicialização voltadas para a proteção de direitos de gestantes de fetos anencéfalos. Pretende-se demonstrar que, no julgamento da ADPF no 54, o STF conseguiu justificar de forma coerente os conceitos que integram o domínio do valor, articulando- os de uma maneira que um complemente o sentido do outro, inexistindo conflito.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)2012text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4204910(Revista) ISSN 2177-7055Seqüência: estudos jurídicos e políticos, ISSN 2177-7055, Vol. 33, Nº. 65, 2012, pags. 155-188porLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
institution |
Dialnet
|
collection |
Dialnet AR
|
source |
Seqüência: estudos jurídicos e políticos, ISSN 2177-7055, Vol. 33, Nº. 65, 2012, pags. 155-188
|
language |
Portuguese
|
topic |
Anencefalia
STF Dworkin Anencephaly Brazilian Supreme Court Dworkin |
spellingShingle |
Anencefalia
STF Dworkin Anencephaly Brazilian Supreme Court Dworkin Bunchaft, Maria Eugenia O Julgamento da ADPF n. 54: uma reflexão à luz de Ronald Dworkin |
description |
The Allegation of Unconstitutionality
number 54 was filed in the Brazilian Supreme
Court by the National Confederation of Health
Workers, and the Supreme Court, by eight votes
to two, upheld the application, declaring the
unconstitutionality of the interpretation that the
interruption of pregnancy of anencephalic fetus
would be typified in the Criminal Code. Advocating
a moral reading of the law, Dworkin argues
that the interpretation of substantive principles
should consider not only the Constitution as a
whole, but also the history, traditions and constitutional
practices. Therefore, we intend to articulate
the theme of the Allegation of Unconstitutionality
number 54 with the Dworkin�s substantialist
perspective, whose proposal for a moral reading
can be an important theoretical framework for understanding
forms of judicialization aimed at protecting
the rights of women with pregnancy of an
anencephalic fetus. We intend to demonstrate that,
in the judgment of the Allegation of Unconstitutionality
number 54, the Brazilian Supreme Court
was able to consistently justify the concepts that
comprise the field of value, articulating them in
a way that one direction complements the other,
therefore eliminating the conflict
|
format |
Article
|
author |
Bunchaft, Maria Eugenia
|
author_facet |
Bunchaft, Maria Eugenia
|
author_sort |
Bunchaft, Maria Eugenia
|
title |
O Julgamento da ADPF n. 54: uma reflexão à luz de Ronald Dworkin
|
title_short |
O Julgamento da ADPF n. 54: uma reflexão à luz de Ronald Dworkin
|
title_full |
O Julgamento da ADPF n. 54: uma reflexão à luz de Ronald Dworkin
|
title_fullStr |
O Julgamento da ADPF n. 54: uma reflexão à luz de Ronald Dworkin
|
title_full_unstemmed |
O Julgamento da ADPF n. 54: uma reflexão à luz de Ronald Dworkin
|
title_sort |
o julgamento da adpf n. 54: uma reflexão à luz de ronald dworkin
|
publisher |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
|
publishDate |
2012
|
url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4204910
|
_version_ |
1709711295015550976
|