O Julgamento da ADPF n. 54: uma reflexão à luz de Ronald Dworkin

The Allegation of Unconstitutionality number 54 was filed in the Brazilian Supreme Court by the National Confederation of Health Workers, and the Supreme Court, by eight votes to two, upheld the application, declaring the unconstitutionality of the interpretation that the interruption of pregnancy o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bunchaft, Maria Eugenia
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) 2012
Subjects:
STF
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4204910
Source:Seqüência: estudos jurídicos e políticos, ISSN 2177-7055, Vol. 33, Nº. 65, 2012, pags. 155-188
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
id
dialnet-ar-18-ART0000548642
record_format
dialnet
spelling
dialnet-ar-18-ART00005486422019-02-19O Julgamento da ADPF n. 54: uma reflexão à luz de Ronald DworkinBunchaft, Maria EugeniaAnencefaliaSTFDworkinAnencephalyBrazilian Supreme CourtDworkinThe Allegation of Unconstitutionality number 54 was filed in the Brazilian Supreme Court by the National Confederation of Health Workers, and the Supreme Court, by eight votes to two, upheld the application, declaring the unconstitutionality of the interpretation that the interruption of pregnancy of anencephalic fetus would be typified in the Criminal Code. Advocating a moral reading of the law, Dworkin argues that the interpretation of substantive principles should consider not only the Constitution as a whole, but also the history, traditions and constitutional practices. Therefore, we intend to articulate the theme of the Allegation of Unconstitutionality number 54 with the Dworkin�s substantialist perspective, whose proposal for a moral reading can be an important theoretical framework for understanding forms of judicialization aimed at protecting the rights of women with pregnancy of an anencephalic fetus. We intend to demonstrate that, in the judgment of the Allegation of Unconstitutionality number 54, the Brazilian Supreme Court was able to consistently justify the concepts that comprise the field of value, articulating them in a way that one direction complements the other, therefore eliminating the conflictA Arguição de Descumprimento de Preceito Fundamental n. 54 foi ajuizada pela Confederação Nacional dos Trabalhadores na Saúde no STF que, por oito votos a dois, julgou procedente o pedido, declarando a inconstitucionalidade da interpretação segundo a qual a interrupção da gravidez de feto anencéfalo seria tipificada no Código Penal. Defendendo uma leitura moral do ordenamento jurídico, Dworkin sustenta que a interpretação de princípios substantivos deve considerar, não apenas a Constituição como um todo, mas também a história, as tradições e as práticas constitucionais. Nesse sentido, pretende-se articular a temática da ADPF n. 54 à perspectiva substancialista delineada por Dworkin, cuja proposta de leitura moral pode ser um referencial teórico importante para compreender formas de judicialização voltadas para a proteção de direitos de gestantes de fetos anencéfalos. Pretende-se demonstrar que, no julgamento da ADPF no 54, o STF conseguiu justificar de forma coerente os conceitos que integram o domínio do valor, articulando- os de uma maneira que um complemente o sentido do outro, inexistindo conflito.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)2012text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4204910(Revista) ISSN 2177-7055Seqüência: estudos jurídicos e políticos, ISSN 2177-7055, Vol. 33, Nº. 65, 2012, pags. 155-188porLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
institution
Dialnet
collection
Dialnet AR
source
Seqüência: estudos jurídicos e políticos, ISSN 2177-7055, Vol. 33, Nº. 65, 2012, pags. 155-188
language
Portuguese
topic
Anencefalia
STF
Dworkin
Anencephaly
Brazilian Supreme Court
Dworkin
spellingShingle
Anencefalia
STF
Dworkin
Anencephaly
Brazilian Supreme Court
Dworkin
Bunchaft, Maria Eugenia
O Julgamento da ADPF n. 54: uma reflexão à luz de Ronald Dworkin
description
The Allegation of Unconstitutionality number 54 was filed in the Brazilian Supreme Court by the National Confederation of Health Workers, and the Supreme Court, by eight votes to two, upheld the application, declaring the unconstitutionality of the interpretation that the interruption of pregnancy of anencephalic fetus would be typified in the Criminal Code. Advocating a moral reading of the law, Dworkin argues that the interpretation of substantive principles should consider not only the Constitution as a whole, but also the history, traditions and constitutional practices. Therefore, we intend to articulate the theme of the Allegation of Unconstitutionality number 54 with the Dworkin�s substantialist perspective, whose proposal for a moral reading can be an important theoretical framework for understanding forms of judicialization aimed at protecting the rights of women with pregnancy of an anencephalic fetus. We intend to demonstrate that, in the judgment of the Allegation of Unconstitutionality number 54, the Brazilian Supreme Court was able to consistently justify the concepts that comprise the field of value, articulating them in a way that one direction complements the other, therefore eliminating the conflict
format
Article
author
Bunchaft, Maria Eugenia
author_facet
Bunchaft, Maria Eugenia
author_sort
Bunchaft, Maria Eugenia
title
O Julgamento da ADPF n. 54: uma reflexão à luz de Ronald Dworkin
title_short
O Julgamento da ADPF n. 54: uma reflexão à luz de Ronald Dworkin
title_full
O Julgamento da ADPF n. 54: uma reflexão à luz de Ronald Dworkin
title_fullStr
O Julgamento da ADPF n. 54: uma reflexão à luz de Ronald Dworkin
title_full_unstemmed
O Julgamento da ADPF n. 54: uma reflexão à luz de Ronald Dworkin
title_sort
o julgamento da adpf n. 54: uma reflexão à luz de ronald dworkin
publisher
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
publishDate
2012
url
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4204910
_version_
1709711295015550976