A necessidade de (re)pensar a realização do Direito em tempos de protagonismo judicial: um percurso possível em busca de uma reflexão refundadora de um novo sentido
Law is inserted in the world of life. It is therefore inextricably linked to social, cultural, economic and political contingencies. Law is a dynamic science, which implies considering that new issues may become object of its interest or old issues may require current and committed reflections. One...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| Published: |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
2011
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=3880839 |
| Source: | Seqüência: estudos jurídicos e políticos, ISSN 2177-7055, Vol. 32, Nº. 63, 2011, pags. 213-234 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0000466359
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Seqüência: estudos jurídicos e políticos, ISSN 2177-7055, Vol. 32, Nº. 63, 2011, pags. 213-234
|
| language |
Portuguese
|
| topic |
Protagonismo Judicial
Poder Judicial Realização Direito Judges Playing Leading Role Judicial Power Law Realization |
| spellingShingle |
Protagonismo Judicial
Poder Judicial Realização Direito Judges Playing Leading Role Judicial Power Law Realization Santos, Mírian dos de Faria Silvestre, Ana Carolina A necessidade de (re)pensar a realização do Direito em tempos de protagonismo judicial: um percurso possível em busca de uma reflexão refundadora de um novo sentido |
| description |
Law is inserted in the world of life. It
is therefore inextricably linked to social, cultural,
economic and political contingencies. Law is a
dynamic science, which implies considering that
new issues may become object of its interest or
old issues may require current and committed reflections.
One of the most recurrent issues in western philosophy
of law and legal theory has been the understanding
of the judge�s role and the limits of his
activities. The judge has already been viewed as a
mere law enforcer, a neutral figure, radically impartial,
whose role was restricted to pronouncing
the truth ontological-substantially provided in the
law (viewed as an authoritative text). The legislative
branch was in charge of making laws and the judicial branch was in charge of enforcing such
laws � an ascetical division among government
agencies, functions and authorities was conceived,
grounded in the classical understanding of the
principle of separation of powers. Creativity was
restricted to the scope of the legislative function
exclusively performed by the legislative branch in
contrast to the enforceability of jurisdiction. Nevertheless,
is there a radical way to separate creation
of law from �law enforcement�? We claim
there is not, that the court activity is unmistakably
creative, and the obligation to (re) think the judicial
function and the role of judge is due to Courts,
law professionals and legal scholars, especially in
times of judges playing the leading role.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Santos, Mírian dos
de Faria Silvestre, Ana Carolina |
| author_facet |
Santos, Mírian dos
de Faria Silvestre, Ana Carolina |
| author_sort |
Santos, Mírian dos
|
| title |
A necessidade de (re)pensar a realização do Direito em tempos de protagonismo judicial: um percurso possível em busca de uma reflexão refundadora de um novo sentido
|
| title_short |
A necessidade de (re)pensar a realização do Direito em tempos de protagonismo judicial: um percurso possível em busca de uma reflexão refundadora de um novo sentido
|
| title_full |
A necessidade de (re)pensar a realização do Direito em tempos de protagonismo judicial: um percurso possível em busca de uma reflexão refundadora de um novo sentido
|
| title_fullStr |
A necessidade de (re)pensar a realização do Direito em tempos de protagonismo judicial: um percurso possível em busca de uma reflexão refundadora de um novo sentido
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
A necessidade de (re)pensar a realização do Direito em tempos de protagonismo judicial: um percurso possível em busca de uma reflexão refundadora de um novo sentido
|
| title_sort |
necessidade de (re)pensar a realização do direito em tempos de protagonismo judicial: um percurso possível em busca de uma reflexão refundadora de um novo sentido
|
| publisher |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
|
| publishDate |
2011
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=3880839
|
| _version_ |
1709710359742382080
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00004663592019-02-17A necessidade de (re)pensar a realização do Direito em tempos de protagonismo judicial: um percurso possível em busca de uma reflexão refundadora de um novo sentidoSantos, Mírian dosde Faria Silvestre, Ana CarolinaProtagonismo JudicialPoder JudicialRealização DireitoJudges PlayingLeading RoleJudicial PowerLaw RealizationLaw is inserted in the world of life. It is therefore inextricably linked to social, cultural, economic and political contingencies. Law is a dynamic science, which implies considering that new issues may become object of its interest or old issues may require current and committed reflections. One of the most recurrent issues in western philosophy of law and legal theory has been the understanding of the judge�s role and the limits of his activities. The judge has already been viewed as a mere law enforcer, a neutral figure, radically impartial, whose role was restricted to pronouncing the truth ontological-substantially provided in the law (viewed as an authoritative text). The legislative branch was in charge of making laws and the judicial branch was in charge of enforcing such laws � an ascetical division among government agencies, functions and authorities was conceived, grounded in the classical understanding of the principle of separation of powers. Creativity was restricted to the scope of the legislative function exclusively performed by the legislative branch in contrast to the enforceability of jurisdiction. Nevertheless, is there a radical way to separate creation of law from �law enforcement�? We claim there is not, that the court activity is unmistakably creative, and the obligation to (re) think the judicial function and the role of judge is due to Courts, law professionals and legal scholars, especially in times of judges playing the leading role.O Direito é uma ciência dinâmica, isso implica considerar que novas questões podem vir a ser objeto de interesse do Direito ou que velhas questões podem demandar atuais e comprometidas reflexões. Uma das questões mais recorrentes no âmbito da Filosofia e da Teoria do Direito ocidentais tem sido a compreensão do papel do juiz e os limites da atividade que ele desempenha. O juiz já foi perspectivado como um mero aplicador de leis, uma figura radicalmente imparcial, cujo papel se restringia a pronunciar a verdade substancialontologicamente encerrada na lei (enquanto texto de autoridade). Ao Poder Legislativo cabia a criação das leis e ao Poder Judiciário a aplicação dessas mesmas leis � concebia-se uma divisão asseptica ............ ................ ................ .... ................ ........- tais, ancorada na compreensao classica do principio da separacao dos poderes. A criatividade se restringia ao ambito da funcao legiferante exercida exclusivamente pelo Poder Legislati- ...... ...... ............................ .... .................. ...................... ...... jurisdicao. Nao obstante, ha como separar radicalmente criacao de �gaplicacao�h do direito? Sustenta-se aqui que nao; que a atividade jurisdicional e iniludivelmente criativa, cabendo aos Tribunais e aos juristas, a obrigacao de (re) pensar a funcao jurisdicional e o papel do juiz, especialmente em tempos de protagonismo judicial.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)2011text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=3880839(Revista) ISSN 2177-7055Seqüência: estudos jurídicos e políticos, ISSN 2177-7055, Vol. 32, Nº. 63, 2011, pags. 213-234porLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|