El fallo “F.A.L.” a través de las críticas feministas al derecho
In 2012 the Supreme Court of Justice issued the ruling “FAL”, which provided legal certainty about the legality of termination in the cases provided by law, defined the standards of the protection of intrauterine life and its arrangement with the international commitments and defined the responsibil...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=9048929 |
| Source: | Derecho y ciencias sociales, ISSN 1852-2971, Nº. 25, 2021 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001617659
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00016176592023-08-09El fallo “F.A.L.” a través de las críticas feministas al derechoMedici, Chantalinterrupción del embarazoFALcríticas feministas al derechointerruption of pregnancyabortionFALfeminist critiquesArgentinaIn 2012 the Supreme Court of Justice issued the ruling “FAL”, which provided legal certainty about the legality of termination in the cases provided by law, defined the standards of the protection of intrauterine life and its arrangement with the international commitments and defined the responsibilities of the state. After the approval of Law 27,610 on Access to Legal Interruption of Pregnancy, conservative sectors initiated a multitude of legal actions, many of which use the same arguments on which the Supreme Court has already established a position. This article reviews the background to the ruling "F.A.L." and the definitions of the sentence and offers an analysis of the contributions that can be made to feminist critiques of the Law.En el año 2012 la Corte Suprema de Justicia emitió el fallo “F.A.L.”, que brindó certeza jurídica acerca de la legalidad de la interrupción del embarazo en los casos previstos por la ley, definió los alcances de la protección de la vida intrauterina y su arreglo con los compromisos internacionales y definió las responsabilidades del Estado. Luego de la aprobación de la ley 27.610 de Acceso a la Interrupción Legal del Embarazo, sectores conservadores iniciaron una multitud de acciones, muchas de las cuales esgrimen los mismos argumentos sobre los cuales la Corte Suprema ya sentó posición. El presente artículo repasa los antecedentes del fallo “F.A.L.” y las definiciones de la sentencia y ofrece un análisis de los aportes que puede realizar a las críticas feministas al Derecho.2021text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=9048929(Revista) ISSN 1853-0982(Revista) ISSN 1852-2971Derecho y ciencias sociales, ISSN 1852-2971, Nº. 25, 2021spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Derecho y ciencias sociales, ISSN 1852-2971, Nº. 25, 2021
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
interrupción del embarazo
FAL críticas feministas al derecho interruption of pregnancy abortion FAL feminist critiques Argentina |
| spellingShingle |
interrupción del embarazo
FAL críticas feministas al derecho interruption of pregnancy abortion FAL feminist critiques Argentina Medici, Chantal El fallo “F.A.L.” a través de las críticas feministas al derecho |
| description |
In 2012 the Supreme Court of Justice issued the ruling “FAL”, which provided legal certainty about the legality of termination in the cases provided by law, defined the standards of the protection of intrauterine life and its arrangement with the international commitments and defined the responsibilities of the state. After the approval of Law 27,610 on Access to Legal Interruption of Pregnancy, conservative sectors initiated a multitude of legal actions, many of which use the same arguments on which the Supreme Court has already established a position.
This article reviews the background to the ruling "F.A.L." and the definitions of the sentence and offers an analysis of the contributions that can be made to feminist critiques of the Law.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Medici, Chantal
|
| author_facet |
Medici, Chantal
|
| author_sort |
Medici, Chantal
|
| title |
El fallo “F.A.L.” a través de las críticas feministas al derecho
|
| title_short |
El fallo “F.A.L.” a través de las críticas feministas al derecho
|
| title_full |
El fallo “F.A.L.” a través de las críticas feministas al derecho
|
| title_fullStr |
El fallo “F.A.L.” a través de las críticas feministas al derecho
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
El fallo “F.A.L.” a través de las críticas feministas al derecho
|
| title_sort |
el fallo “f.a.l.” a través de las críticas feministas al derecho
|
| publishDate |
2021
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=9048929
|
| _version_ |
1773896307771965440
|