O Supremo Tribunal Federal como garantidor do estado de direito ambiental no governo do presidente Jair Bolsonaro
This paper aims to analyze the performance of the Supreme Federal Court (Brazil) in the judgments of environmental matters originating from international obligations assumed by Brazil and the posture of the government of Jair Messias Bolsonaro, which oscillates between populism and denialism. The rh...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| Published: |
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=9027449 |
| Source: | Revista Brasileira de Direito, ISSN 2238-0604, Vol. 18, Nº. 3, 2022 (Ejemplar dedicado a: RBD. Set.-Dez./2022; e4750) |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001612831
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista Brasileira de Direito, ISSN 2238-0604, Vol. 18, Nº. 3, 2022 (Ejemplar dedicado a: RBD. Set.-Dez./2022; e4750)
|
| language |
Portuguese
|
| topic |
Populism
International Law Transnational Law Supreme Federal Court Rule of Environmental Law Populismo Direito Internacional Direito Transnacional Supremo Tribunal Federal Estado Ambiental de Direito |
| spellingShingle |
Populism
International Law Transnational Law Supreme Federal Court Rule of Environmental Law Populismo Direito Internacional Direito Transnacional Supremo Tribunal Federal Estado Ambiental de Direito Staffen, Márcio Ricardo O Supremo Tribunal Federal como garantidor do estado de direito ambiental no governo do presidente Jair Bolsonaro |
| description |
This paper aims to analyze the performance of the Supreme Federal Court (Brazil) in the judgments of environmental matters originating from international obligations assumed by Brazil and the posture of the government of Jair Messias Bolsonaro, which oscillates between populism and denialism. The rhetorical strategy of the heads of the federal Executive is not a recent novelty in Brazil, the last President of the Republic, following the modus operandi of other counterparts, intensified the use of populism in an attack on the international legal order and its institutions. In its functions, the Brazilian Federal Legislative was held in a mere supporting role, without a clear defense of the internationally binding legal ties to Brazil or a posture of interpellation to the Executive for the maintenance and enhancement of domestic law in the face of the law arising from outside its territory. Thus, the Supreme Federal Court assumed the condition of guarantor of transnational legal claims and international law as a brake on this negationist populism against the International Law, contemplating the prevalence of the protection of Human Rights, Democracy, the Environment Law and the Rule of Law. For the development of this research, the inductive method was used, operationalized by the operational concept techniques, bibliographic research and jurisprudential analysis.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Staffen, Márcio Ricardo
|
| author_facet |
Staffen, Márcio Ricardo
|
| author_sort |
Staffen, Márcio Ricardo
|
| title |
O Supremo Tribunal Federal como garantidor do estado de direito ambiental no governo do presidente Jair Bolsonaro
|
| title_short |
O Supremo Tribunal Federal como garantidor do estado de direito ambiental no governo do presidente Jair Bolsonaro
|
| title_full |
O Supremo Tribunal Federal como garantidor do estado de direito ambiental no governo do presidente Jair Bolsonaro
|
| title_fullStr |
O Supremo Tribunal Federal como garantidor do estado de direito ambiental no governo do presidente Jair Bolsonaro
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
O Supremo Tribunal Federal como garantidor do estado de direito ambiental no governo do presidente Jair Bolsonaro
|
| title_sort |
o supremo tribunal federal como garantidor do estado de direito ambiental no governo do presidente jair bolsonaro
|
| publishDate |
2022
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=9027449
|
| _version_ |
1771903161101975552
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00016128312023-07-18O Supremo Tribunal Federal como garantidor do estado de direito ambiental no governo do presidente Jair BolsonaroStaffen, Márcio RicardoPopulismInternational LawTransnational LawSupreme Federal CourtRule of Environmental LawPopulismoDireito InternacionalDireito TransnacionalSupremo Tribunal FederalEstado Ambiental de DireitoThis paper aims to analyze the performance of the Supreme Federal Court (Brazil) in the judgments of environmental matters originating from international obligations assumed by Brazil and the posture of the government of Jair Messias Bolsonaro, which oscillates between populism and denialism. The rhetorical strategy of the heads of the federal Executive is not a recent novelty in Brazil, the last President of the Republic, following the modus operandi of other counterparts, intensified the use of populism in an attack on the international legal order and its institutions. In its functions, the Brazilian Federal Legislative was held in a mere supporting role, without a clear defense of the internationally binding legal ties to Brazil or a posture of interpellation to the Executive for the maintenance and enhancement of domestic law in the face of the law arising from outside its territory. Thus, the Supreme Federal Court assumed the condition of guarantor of transnational legal claims and international law as a brake on this negationist populism against the International Law, contemplating the prevalence of the protection of Human Rights, Democracy, the Environment Law and the Rule of Law. For the development of this research, the inductive method was used, operationalized by the operational concept techniques, bibliographic research and jurisprudential analysis.O presente artigo objetiva analisar a atuação do Supremo Tribunal Federal (Brasil) nos julgamentos de matérias ambientais originárias de obrigações internacionais assumidas pelo Brasil e a postura do governo de Jair Messias Bolsonaro que oscila entre o populismo e o negacionismo. Em que pese o populismo, como estratégia retórica dos chefes do Executivo federal não seja uma novidade recente no Brasil, o último Presidente da República, seguindo modus operandi de outros homólogos intensificou o uso do populismo em ataque a ordem legal transnacional e suas instituições. Em suas funções, o Legislativo federal brasileiro conteve-se em papel de mero coadjuvante, sem clara defesa dos vínculos jurídicos internacionalmente cogentes ao Brasil ou postura de interpelação ao Executivo para manutenção e incremento do direito nacional perante o direito advindo de fora do seu território. Assim, o Supremo Tribunal Federal assenhorou-se da condição de garantidor de pretensões jurídicas transnacionais e do direito internacional como freio deste populismo negacionista contra o Direito Internacional, contemplando a prevalência da tutela dos Direitos Humanos, da Democracia, do Meio Ambiente e do Estado de Direito. Utilizou-se, para o desenvolvimento da presente pesquisa, o método indutivo, operacionalizado pelas técnicas de conceito operacional, da pesquisa bibliográfica e de análise jurisprudencial.2022text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=9027449(Revista) ISSN 2238-0604Revista Brasileira de Direito, ISSN 2238-0604, Vol. 18, Nº. 3, 2022 (Ejemplar dedicado a: RBD. Set.-Dez./2022; e4750)porLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|