Ministério Público Federal como uma grade de proteção da democracia brasileira

dialnet-ar-18-ART0001610321

dialnet

Dialnet

Dialnet AR

Revista Brasileira de Direito, ISSN 2238-0604, Vol. 18, Nº. 1, 2022 (Ejemplar dedicado a: RBD. JAN-ABR/2022; e4689)

Portuguese

Democracy
Federal Public Ministry
Autocracy
Direito
Democracia
Ministério Público Federal
Autocracia

Democracy
Federal Public Ministry
Autocracy
Direito
Democracia
Ministério Público Federal
Autocracia
Garbaccio, Grace Ladeira
Bandeira, Gonçalo S. de Melo
Costa, Igor Rodrigues
Ministério Público Federal como uma grade de proteção da democracia brasileira

The Federal Constitution of 1988, in the caput of art. 127, confers the guardianship of the Brazilian democratic regime to the Public Prosecutor’s Office, an institution that has gained independence, a wide range of procedural action, and guarantees identical to those of the Judiciary, precisely in compliance with its constitutional mission. Since 2014, it has been possible to see demonstrations in Brazil that have antidemocratic agendas, in a clear subversion of the Federal Constitution and even the criminal law. The literature has indicated that authoritarian governments come to power in scenarios like this one, in a constant use of the democratic machine to implement their autocratic agendas. The objective here is to explore how the Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office has behaved about the full compliance with the provisions of art. 127 of the Constitution, that is, what the institution has done with regard to the guardianship of democracy and the values of this regime that is threatened by the country’s current political situation. In addition, to understand how the members of the institution see this constitutional role. Regarding methodology, the research is qualitative in nature, empirical, qualitative in approach, and descriptive in design. The data was collected through interviews with semi-structured scripts, conducted with 50 public prosecutors at the three levels of the career. The data were analysed using content analysis and process-tracing methods. It was concluded that the MPF has failed to protect democracy, which is characterized by a lack of action by the institution.

Article

Garbaccio, Grace Ladeira
Bandeira, Gonçalo S. de Melo
Costa, Igor Rodrigues

Garbaccio, Grace Ladeira
Bandeira, Gonçalo S. de Melo
Costa, Igor Rodrigues

Garbaccio, Grace Ladeira

Ministério Público Federal como uma grade de proteção da democracia brasileira

Ministério Público Federal como uma grade de proteção da democracia brasileira

Ministério Público Federal como uma grade de proteção da democracia brasileira

Ministério Público Federal como uma grade de proteção da democracia brasileira

Ministério Público Federal como uma grade de proteção da democracia brasileira

ministério público federal como uma grade de proteção da democracia brasileira

2022

https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=9013785

1771178400299352064

dialnet-ar-18-ART00016103212023-07-08Ministério Público Federal como uma grade de proteção da democracia brasileiraGarbaccio, Grace LadeiraBandeira, Gonçalo S. de MeloCosta, Igor RodriguesDemocracyFederal Public MinistryAutocracyDireitoDemocraciaMinistério Público FederalAutocraciaThe Federal Constitution of 1988, in the caput of art. 127, confers the guardianship of the Brazilian democratic regime to the Public Prosecutor’s Office, an institution that has gained independence, a wide range of procedural action, and guarantees identical to those of the Judiciary, precisely in compliance with its constitutional mission. Since 2014, it has been possible to see demonstrations in Brazil that have antidemocratic agendas, in a clear subversion of the Federal Constitution and even the criminal law. The literature has indicated that authoritarian governments come to power in scenarios like this one, in a constant use of the democratic machine to implement their autocratic agendas. The objective here is to explore how the Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office has behaved about the full compliance with the provisions of art. 127 of the Constitution, that is, what the institution has done with regard to the guardianship of democracy and the values of this regime that is threatened by the country’s current political situation. In addition, to understand how the members of the institution see this constitutional role. Regarding methodology, the research is qualitative in nature, empirical, qualitative in approach, and descriptive in design. The data was collected through interviews with semi-structured scripts, conducted with 50 public prosecutors at the three levels of the career. The data were analysed using content analysis and process-tracing methods. It was concluded that the MPF has failed to protect democracy, which is characterized by a lack of action by the institution.A Constituição Federal de 1988, no caput do art. 127, confere a guarda do regime democrático brasileiro ao Ministério Público, instituição que conquistou independência, amplo leque de atuação processual e garantias idênticas às do Poder Judiciário, justamente em cumprimento à sua missão constitucional. Desde 2014, é possível visualizar no Brasil manifestações que traziam em si pautas antidemocráticas, em uma clara subversão à Constituição Federal e até mesmo à legislação penal. A literatura tem indicado que governos autoritários chegam ao poder em cenários semelhantes a esse, em um uso constante da máquina democrática para implementem suas pautas autocráticas. O objetivo aqui é explorar de que forma o Ministério Público Federal tem se comportado quanto ao pleno cumprimento do disposto no art. 127, da Constituição, ou seja, o que tem feito a instituição em relação à guarda da democracia e dos valores desse regime ameaçado pela atual conjuntura política do país. Além disso, compreender como os membros da instituição enxergam esse papel constitucional. No que tange à metodologia, a pesquisa é de cunho qualitativo natureza empírica, abordagem qualitativa e delineamento descritivo. A coleta de dados se deu através de entrevistas com roteiros semiestruturados, realizadas com 50 procuradores da República nos três níveis da carreira. A análise dos dados foi realizada com os métodos de análise de conteúdo e process-tracing. Concluiu-se que o MPF tem falhado em proteger a democracia, o que se caracteriza pela falta de ação da instituição. 2022text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=9013785(Revista) ISSN 2238-0604Revista Brasileira de Direito, ISSN 2238-0604, Vol. 18, Nº. 1, 2022 (Ejemplar dedicado a: RBD. JAN-ABR/2022; e4689)porLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI