Does Brazil need a notwithstanding clause?
In the last decade, Brazilian Supreme Court has been playing a very important role in the democratic process, raising concerns on judicial activism and on the so-called “juristocracy”. One of the ideas that comes up to tackle those issues is the adoption of a Canadian-style notwithstanding clause. R...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8983701 |
| Source: | Revista de Investigações Constitucionais, ISSN 2359-5639, Vol. 9, Nº. 2, 2022 (Ejemplar dedicado a: maio/agosto), pags. 329-345 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001605571
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00016055712023-06-16Does Brazil need a notwithstanding clause?Diniz Araújo, Luiz HenriqueControle judicial de constitucionalidadeCláusula do não obstanteAtivismo judicialControle judicial de constitucionalidadeDiálogos institucionaisDireito constitucionalIn the last decade, Brazilian Supreme Court has been playing a very important role in the democratic process, raising concerns on judicial activism and on the so-called “juristocracy”. One of the ideas that comes up to tackle those issues is the adoption of a Canadian-style notwithstanding clause. Revolving the notwithstanding clause features and its practical exercise in Canada, the paper contends that it is not suitable for Brazilian constitutional system of strong judicial review. It also demonstrates that such a constitutional instrument would not help the improvement of institutional dialogues between the judiciary and legislative branches nor effectively remedy hints of judicial activism. 2022text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8983701(Revista) ISSN 2359-5639Revista de Investigações Constitucionais, ISSN 2359-5639, Vol. 9, Nº. 2, 2022 (Ejemplar dedicado a: maio/agosto), pags. 329-345engLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista de Investigações Constitucionais, ISSN 2359-5639, Vol. 9, Nº. 2, 2022 (Ejemplar dedicado a: maio/agosto), pags. 329-345
|
| language |
English
|
| topic |
Controle judicial de constitucionalidade
Cláusula do não obstante Ativismo judicial Controle judicial de constitucionalidade Diálogos institucionais Direito constitucional |
| spellingShingle |
Controle judicial de constitucionalidade
Cláusula do não obstante Ativismo judicial Controle judicial de constitucionalidade Diálogos institucionais Direito constitucional Diniz Araújo, Luiz Henrique Does Brazil need a notwithstanding clause? |
| description |
In the last decade, Brazilian Supreme Court has been playing a very important role in the democratic process, raising concerns on judicial activism and on the so-called “juristocracy”. One of the ideas that comes up to tackle those issues is the adoption of a Canadian-style notwithstanding clause. Revolving the notwithstanding clause features and its practical exercise in Canada, the paper contends that it is not suitable for Brazilian constitutional system of strong judicial review. It also demonstrates that such a constitutional instrument would not help the improvement of institutional dialogues between the judiciary and legislative branches nor effectively remedy hints of judicial activism.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Diniz Araújo, Luiz Henrique
|
| author_facet |
Diniz Araújo, Luiz Henrique
|
| author_sort |
Diniz Araújo, Luiz Henrique
|
| title |
Does Brazil need a notwithstanding clause?
|
| title_short |
Does Brazil need a notwithstanding clause?
|
| title_full |
Does Brazil need a notwithstanding clause?
|
| title_fullStr |
Does Brazil need a notwithstanding clause?
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Does Brazil need a notwithstanding clause?
|
| title_sort |
does brazil need a notwithstanding clause?
|
| publishDate |
2022
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8983701
|
| _version_ |
1769004046065074176
|