El código civil de Andrés Bello y el movimiento exegético en Colombia
This paper is interested in the reception of the civil code of Andrés Bello in Colombia during the second half of the 19th century and the first decades of the 20th century. Likewise, it relates the above to the emergence of the Colombian exegetical movement, close to –as well as different– from the...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8982812 |
| Source: | Revista Jurídica Mario Alario D'Filippo, ISSN 2256-2796, Vol. 14, Nº. 27, 2022, pags. 47-65 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001605432
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista Jurídica Mario Alario D'Filippo, ISSN 2256-2796, Vol. 14, Nº. 27, 2022, pags. 47-65
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
The Civil Code
the exegetical movement exegesis Andrés Bello Colombia Código Civil movimiento exegético exégesis Andrés Bello Colombia |
| spellingShingle |
The Civil Code
the exegetical movement exegesis Andrés Bello Colombia Código Civil movimiento exegético exégesis Andrés Bello Colombia Botero Bernal, Andrés El código civil de Andrés Bello y el movimiento exegético en Colombia |
| description |
This paper is interested in the reception of the civil code of Andrés Bello in Colombia during the second half of the 19th century and the first decades of the 20th century. Likewise, it relates the above to the emergence of the Colombian exegetical movement, close to –as well as different– from the movement of French commentators on the Civil Code of 1804, a movement that will be called, pejoratively in the 20th century, as “exegesis”. Now, this work is justified by the importance of articulating, due to the potentialities that this allows, the legal history with the comparative law, remembering that both disciplines had common origins. This is so, to understand law historically, it is necessary to understand it as a product of cultures in constant communication, in such a way that comparative analysis, in our view, appears as necessary for history, and vice versa. We hope then that the reader can observe that exegesis, if we may use this word, was not homogeneous throughout the Western Hemisphere, but there are still points in common regarding some of its most important postulates. Understanding this movement happens, we believe, by recognizing the similarities and differences with other previous, concomitant, and subsequent movements.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Botero Bernal, Andrés
|
| author_facet |
Botero Bernal, Andrés
|
| author_sort |
Botero Bernal, Andrés
|
| title |
El código civil de Andrés Bello y el movimiento exegético en Colombia
|
| title_short |
El código civil de Andrés Bello y el movimiento exegético en Colombia
|
| title_full |
El código civil de Andrés Bello y el movimiento exegético en Colombia
|
| title_fullStr |
El código civil de Andrés Bello y el movimiento exegético en Colombia
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
El código civil de Andrés Bello y el movimiento exegético en Colombia
|
| title_sort |
el código civil de andrés bello y el movimiento exegético en colombia
|
| publishDate |
2022
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8982812
|
| _version_ |
1768913459534102528
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00016054322023-06-15El código civil de Andrés Bello y el movimiento exegético en ColombiaBotero Bernal, AndrésThe Civil Codethe exegetical movementexegesisAndrés BelloColombiaCódigo Civilmovimiento exegéticoexégesisAndrés BelloColombiaThis paper is interested in the reception of the civil code of Andrés Bello in Colombia during the second half of the 19th century and the first decades of the 20th century. Likewise, it relates the above to the emergence of the Colombian exegetical movement, close to –as well as different– from the movement of French commentators on the Civil Code of 1804, a movement that will be called, pejoratively in the 20th century, as “exegesis”. Now, this work is justified by the importance of articulating, due to the potentialities that this allows, the legal history with the comparative law, remembering that both disciplines had common origins. This is so, to understand law historically, it is necessary to understand it as a product of cultures in constant communication, in such a way that comparative analysis, in our view, appears as necessary for history, and vice versa. We hope then that the reader can observe that exegesis, if we may use this word, was not homogeneous throughout the Western Hemisphere, but there are still points in common regarding some of its most important postulates. Understanding this movement happens, we believe, by recognizing the similarities and differences with other previous, concomitant, and subsequent movements.El presente escrito se interesa por la recepción del código civil de Andrés Bello en Colombia, durante la segunda mitad del siglo XIX y las primeras décadas del siglo XX. Igualmente, relaciona lo anterior con el surgimiento del movimiento exegético colombiano, cercano - además de diferente – al movimiento de los comentadores franceses del Código Civil de 1804, movimiento que será́ denominado, peyorativamente en pleno siglo XX, como “exégesis”. Ahora bien, este trabajo se justifica por la importancia de articular, dadas las potencialidades que ello permite, la iushistoria con la iuscomparatística, recordando que ambas disciplinas tuvieron orígenes comunes. Es así que, para poder comprender históricamente el Derecho, es necesario entenderlo como un producto de culturas en constante comunicación, de manera tal que la comparatística, a nuestro modo de ver, aparece como necesaria para la historia, y viceversa. Esperamos entonces que el lector pueda observar que la exégesis, si se nos permite usar esta palabra, no fue homogénea en todo el hemisferio occidental, pero aún existen puntos en común en lo que atañe a algunos de sus postulados más importantes. Comprender este movimiento pasa, creemos, por reconocer las similitudes y las diferencias con otros movimientos previos, concomitantes y posteriores.2022text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8982812(Revista) ISSN 2145-6054(Revista) ISSN 2256-2796Revista Jurídica Mario Alario D'Filippo, ISSN 2256-2796, Vol. 14, Nº. 27, 2022, pags. 47-65spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|