La Corte Constitucional como garante del Principio de Independencia Judicial en Ecuador
This article aims to analyze the Jurisdictional action of the Constitutional Court within Sentence 3-19-CN / 20, in which within a process of consultation of the norm carried out by a judicial body of instance, it makes an interpretation according mainly of the figure of an excusable error. Therefor...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8965153 |
Source: | Iustitia Socialis: Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Criminalísticas, ISSN 2542-3371, Vol. 6, Nº. 10, 2021, pags. 33-46 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001602914
|
---|---|
record_format |
dialnet
|
spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00016029142023-06-03La Corte Constitucional como garante del Principio de Independencia Judicial en EcuadorZapata Fajardo, María JoséRonquillo Riera, Orlando IvanAtencio González, Rously EedyahLegal SciencesJudicial independenceconstitutional courtprinciple(Words from UNESCO Thesaurus)Ciencias JurídicasIndependencia judicialcorte constitucionalprincipio (Palabras tomadas del Tesauro UNESCO)This article aims to analyze the Jurisdictional action of the Constitutional Court within Sentence 3-19-CN / 20, in which within a process of consultation of the norm carried out by a judicial body of instance, it makes an interpretation according mainly of the figure of an excusable error. Therefore, the general objective was to analyze the Jurisdictional action of the Constitutional Court within Sentence 3-19-CN / 20, in the administration of justice and violation of the principle of Judicial Independence in Ecuador. Under the qualitative and methodological approach from a descriptive-documentary type, through a bibliographic design, it allowed the analytical review made up of: laws, legal documents, articles and research papers, scrutinizing it through the analytical-synthetic method and analysis of legal content. It is observed that a court is the one who must declare the existence of inexcusable error, fraud or negligence in the processing of legal cases, otherwise it would imply disrespect for the principle of judicial independence.El artículo tiene como propósito analizar la actuación Jurisdiccional de la Corte Constitucional dentro de la Sentencia 3-19-CN/20, en la cual dentro de un proceso de consulta de norma efectuado por un órgano jurisdiccional de instancia, realiza una interpretación conforme principalmente, de la figura de error enexcusable. Por todo ello se planteó como objetivo general analizar la actuación Jurisdiccional de la Corte Constitucional dentro de la Sentencia 3-19-CN/20, en la administracion de justicia y vulneración del principio de Independencia Judicial en Ecuador. Bajo el enfoque cualitativo y metodológicamente desde un tipo descriptivo–documental, mediante un diseño bibliográfico, permitió la revisión analítica conformada por: leyes, documentos jurídicos, artículos y trabajos de investigación, escrutándose a través del método analítico – sintético y análisis de contenido jurídico. Se observa que un órgano jurisdiccional es quien debe declarar la existencia de error inexcusable, dolo o negligencia en la tramitación de causas judiciales, lo contrario supondría irrespeto al principio de independencia judicial.2021text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8965153(Revista) ISSN 2542-3371Iustitia Socialis: Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Criminalísticas, ISSN 2542-3371, Vol. 6, Nº. 10, 2021, pags. 33-46spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
institution |
Dialnet
|
collection |
Dialnet AR
|
source |
Iustitia Socialis: Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Criminalísticas, ISSN 2542-3371, Vol. 6, Nº. 10, 2021, pags. 33-46
|
language |
Spanish
|
topic |
Legal Sciences
Judicial independence constitutional court principle (Words from UNESCO Thesaurus) Ciencias Jurídicas Independencia judicial corte constitucional principio (Palabras tomadas del Tesauro UNESCO) |
spellingShingle |
Legal Sciences
Judicial independence constitutional court principle (Words from UNESCO Thesaurus) Ciencias Jurídicas Independencia judicial corte constitucional principio (Palabras tomadas del Tesauro UNESCO) Zapata Fajardo, María José Ronquillo Riera, Orlando Ivan Atencio González, Rously Eedyah La Corte Constitucional como garante del Principio de Independencia Judicial en Ecuador |
description |
This article aims to analyze the Jurisdictional action of the Constitutional Court within Sentence 3-19-CN / 20, in which within a process of consultation of the norm carried out by a judicial body of instance, it makes an interpretation according mainly of the figure of an excusable error. Therefore, the general objective was to analyze the Jurisdictional action of the Constitutional Court within Sentence 3-19-CN / 20, in the administration of justice and violation of the principle of Judicial Independence in Ecuador. Under the qualitative and methodological approach from a descriptive-documentary type, through a bibliographic design, it allowed the analytical review made up of: laws, legal documents, articles and research papers, scrutinizing it through the analytical-synthetic method and analysis of legal content. It is observed that a court is the one who must declare the existence of inexcusable error, fraud or negligence in the processing of legal cases, otherwise it would imply disrespect for the principle of judicial independence.
|
format |
Article
|
author |
Zapata Fajardo, María José
Ronquillo Riera, Orlando Ivan Atencio González, Rously Eedyah |
author_facet |
Zapata Fajardo, María José
Ronquillo Riera, Orlando Ivan Atencio González, Rously Eedyah |
author_sort |
Zapata Fajardo, María José
|
title |
La Corte Constitucional como garante del Principio de Independencia Judicial en Ecuador
|
title_short |
La Corte Constitucional como garante del Principio de Independencia Judicial en Ecuador
|
title_full |
La Corte Constitucional como garante del Principio de Independencia Judicial en Ecuador
|
title_fullStr |
La Corte Constitucional como garante del Principio de Independencia Judicial en Ecuador
|
title_full_unstemmed |
La Corte Constitucional como garante del Principio de Independencia Judicial en Ecuador
|
title_sort |
la corte constitucional como garante del principio de independencia judicial en ecuador
|
publishDate |
2021
|
url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8965153
|
_version_ |
1767826335935234048
|