Servicios mínimos: un análisis de su regulación en Chile
here is consensus in recognizing each institution of collective labor law -unionization, collective bargaining, and strike- as fundamental rights. Nevertheless, there is also agreement regarding the non-absolute nature of rights, as with the right to strike. Particularly when its exercise conflicts...
Gorde:
| Egile nagusia: | |
|---|---|
| Formatua: | Artikulua |
| Hizkuntza: | Gaztelania |
| Argitaratua: |
2021
|
| Gaiak: | |
| Sarrera elektronikoa: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8944250 |
| Baliabidea: | Revista Jurídica Digital UANDES, ISSN 0719-7942, Vol. 5, Nº. 1, 2021, pags. 1-30 |
| Etiketak: |
Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe: Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen
|
| Laburpena: |
here is consensus in recognizing each institution of collective labor law -unionization, collective bargaining, and strike- as fundamental rights. Nevertheless, there is also agreement regarding the non-absolute nature of rights, as with the right to strike. Particularly when its exercise conflicts with third parties or the community’s constitutionally protected essential interests. In this context, we analyze the right to strike and its legal recognition, and its limitations. Thus, we address the concept of essential services and minimum services (the latter regulated in Law No. 20,940) and the Labor Office’s criteria when determining and qualifying it under said regulation |
|---|