Análisis de efectividad de la sentencia T-622/16 ¿Sentencia estructural-dialógica?
This paper analyzes the ruling T-622/16 of the Constitutional Court of Colombia that recognizes the Atrato River, its basin, and tributaries, as an entity subject to the rights of protection, conservation, maintenance and restoration by the State and ethnic communities. The court ruling is part of t...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8903645 |
| Source: | IUS : revista del Instituto de Ciencias Jurídicas de Puebla, ISSN 1870-2147, null 16, Nº. 49, 2022, pags. 213-222 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001593431
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00015934312023-04-25Análisis de efectividad de la sentencia T-622/16 ¿Sentencia estructural-dialógica?Guzmán Jiménez, Luis FelipeJusticia ambientaltribunal constitucionalsentencias estructuralesmedio ambientecuencas hídricasEnvironmental justiceconstitutional courtstructural sentencesenvironmentwater basinsThis paper analyzes the ruling T-622/16 of the Constitutional Court of Colombia that recognizes the Atrato River, its basin, and tributaries, as an entity subject to the rights of protection, conservation, maintenance and restoration by the State and ethnic communities. The court ruling is part of the new lines of action of the constitutional courts that seek to guarantee environmental justice based on two central aspects: on the one hand, the legal personality of nature and its elements and, on the other, the constitutional duty to protect the environment. Such analysis attempts to prove that the former is inappropriate to protect the natural environment and its components; while the second is suitable for this. Precisely, in the second aspect, the Court orders the implementation of an action plan to decontaminate the basin and the creation of bodies (commission of guardians and a panel of experts) to guarantee the effective implementation of human rights and the cessation of the serious violation to these same fundamental and collective rights. We consider that it is a “structural failure” in its dialogical typology.Este trabajo analiza la sentencia T-622/16 de la Corte Constitucional de Colombia que reconoce al río Atrato, su cuenca y afluentes, como una entidad sujeto de derechos a la protección, conservación, mantenimiento y restauración a cargo del Estado y las comunidades étnicas. El fallo judicial hace parte de las nuevas líneas de acción de los tribunales constitucionales que pretenden garantizar una justicia ambiental a partir de dos aspectos centrales: por una parte, la personalidad jurídica de la naturaleza y de sus elementos y, por otra, el deber constitucional de proteger el medio ambiente. Dicho análisis intenta probar que el primero es inapropiado para amparar el entorno natural y sus componentes; mientras que el segundo es adecuado para esto. Precisamente, en el segundo aspecto, la Corte ordena la implementación de un plan de acción para descontaminar la cuenca y la creación de órganos (comisión de guardianes y un panel de expertos) para garantizar la implementación efectiva y la cesación de la grave vulneración de derechos fundamentales y colectivos. Consideramos que es un “fallo estructural” en su tipología dialógica.2022text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8903645(Revista) ISSN 1870-2147IUS : revista del Instituto de Ciencias Jurídicas de Puebla, ISSN 1870-2147, null 16, Nº. 49, 2022, pags. 213-222spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
IUS : revista del Instituto de Ciencias Jurídicas de Puebla, ISSN 1870-2147, null 16, Nº. 49, 2022, pags. 213-222
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
Justicia ambiental
tribunal constitucional sentencias estructurales medio ambiente cuencas hídricas Environmental justice constitutional court structural sentences environment water basins |
| spellingShingle |
Justicia ambiental
tribunal constitucional sentencias estructurales medio ambiente cuencas hídricas Environmental justice constitutional court structural sentences environment water basins Guzmán Jiménez, Luis Felipe Análisis de efectividad de la sentencia T-622/16 ¿Sentencia estructural-dialógica? |
| description |
This paper analyzes the ruling T-622/16 of the Constitutional Court of Colombia that recognizes the Atrato River, its basin, and tributaries, as an entity subject to the rights of protection, conservation, maintenance and restoration by the State and ethnic communities. The court ruling is part of the new lines of action of the constitutional courts that seek to guarantee environmental justice based on two central aspects: on the one hand, the legal personality of nature and its elements and, on the other, the constitutional duty to protect the environment. Such analysis attempts to prove that the former is inappropriate to protect the natural environment and its components; while the second is suitable for this. Precisely, in the second aspect, the Court orders the implementation of an action plan to decontaminate the basin and the creation of bodies (commission of guardians and a panel of experts) to guarantee the effective implementation of human rights and the cessation of the serious violation to these same fundamental and collective rights. We consider that it is a “structural failure” in its dialogical typology.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Guzmán Jiménez, Luis Felipe
|
| author_facet |
Guzmán Jiménez, Luis Felipe
|
| author_sort |
Guzmán Jiménez, Luis Felipe
|
| title |
Análisis de efectividad de la sentencia T-622/16 ¿Sentencia estructural-dialógica?
|
| title_short |
Análisis de efectividad de la sentencia T-622/16 ¿Sentencia estructural-dialógica?
|
| title_full |
Análisis de efectividad de la sentencia T-622/16 ¿Sentencia estructural-dialógica?
|
| title_fullStr |
Análisis de efectividad de la sentencia T-622/16 ¿Sentencia estructural-dialógica?
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Análisis de efectividad de la sentencia T-622/16 ¿Sentencia estructural-dialógica?
|
| title_sort |
análisis de efectividad de la sentencia t-622/16 ¿sentencia estructural-dialógica?
|
| publishDate |
2022
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8903645
|
| _version_ |
1764293015760797696
|