Análisis de la sentencia número 166-15-SEP-CC (caso Nº 0507-12-EP) de la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador
The Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador recognizes nature as a living being and, as such, is the holder of rights with legal capacity to be exercised; therefore, its compliance and observance is mandatory for public servants -at any level of government- in a transversal way. The Constitutional C...
Gorde:
| Egile nagusia: | |
|---|---|
| Formatua: | Artikulua |
| Hizkuntza: | Gaztelania |
| Argitaratua: |
2022
|
| Gaiak: | |
| Sarrera elektronikoa: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=8903638 |
| Baliabidea: | IUS : revista del Instituto de Ciencias Jurídicas de Puebla, ISSN 1870-2147, null 16, Nº. 49, 2022, pags. 45-63 |
| Etiketak: |
Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe: Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen
|
| Laburpena: |
The Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador recognizes nature as a living being and, as such, is the holder of rights with legal capacity to be exercised; therefore, its compliance and observance is mandatory for public servants -at any level of government- in a transversal way. The Constitutional Court will protect the rights of nature through actions that assert constitutiona supremacy. In the sentence that is analyzed in this work, the Constitutional Court ruled if the resolution of the Provincial Court of Esmeraldas, when weighing greater relevance of property and economic rights over the rights of nature, was substantiated and motivated in accordance with requirements of reasonableness, logic and comprehensibility, by allowing the use and exploitation of part of the physical space of the Cayapa-Mataje ecological reserve to an individual, for commercial purposes. |
|---|